Back to Search Start Over

Experimental Assessment of Splicing Variants Using Expression Minigenes and Comparison with In Silico Predictions

Authors :
Margarida D. Amaral
Jeenah Park
Neeraj Sharma
Melissa Lee
Garry R. Cutting
Arianna Franca
Rachel Karchin
Laura B. Gottschalk
Anabela S. Ramalho
Christopher Douville
Briana Vecchio-Pagan
Karen S. Raraigh
Patrick R. Sosnay
Source :
Human Mutation. 35:1249-1259
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Hindawi Limited, 2014.

Abstract

Assessment of the functional consequences of variants near splice sites is a major challenge in the diagnostic laboratory. To address this issue, we created expression minigenes (EMGs) to determine the RNA and protein products generated by splice site variants (n = 10) implicated in cystic fibrosis (CF). Experimental results were compared with the splicing predictions of eight in silico tools. EMGs containing the full-length Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) coding sequence and flanking intron sequences generated wild-type transcript and fully processed protein in Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK293) and CF bronchial epithelial (CFBE41o-) cells. Quantification of variant induced aberrant mRNA isoforms was concordant using fragment analysis and pyrosequencing. The splicing patterns of c.1585−1G>A and c.2657+5G>A were comparable to those reported in primary cells from individuals bearing these variants. Bioinformatics predictions were consistent with experimental results for 9/10 variants (MES), 8/10 variants (NNSplice), and 7/10 variants (SSAT and Sroogle). Programs that estimate the consequences of mis-splicing predicted 11/16 (HSF and ASSEDA) and 10/16 (Fsplice and SplicePort) experimentally observed mRNA isoforms. EMGs provide a robust experimental approach for clinical interpretation of splice site variants and refinement of in silico tools.

Details

ISSN :
10597794
Volume :
35
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Human Mutation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1c81be0730473f02d805c0ffd3e84c82
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22624