Back to Search
Start Over
Assessment of the consequences of caregiving in psychosis: a psychometric comparison of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ)
- Source :
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017), Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, instname
- Publisher :
- Springer Nature
-
Abstract
- Background: The Zarit Burden Interview ( ZBI) was originally developed to assess the level of subjective burden in caregivers of people with dementia. The Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire ( IEQ) is amongst the leading scales to assess caregiving consequences in severe mental illness. We aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the ZBI, a generic tool, and of the IEQ, a more specific tool to assess the consequences of caregiving in schizophrenia and related disorders. Methods: Secondary analyses of a 16- week, randomized controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention in 223 primary caregivers of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Psychometric properties ( internal consistency, convergent and discriminative validity, and sensitivity to change) were evaluated for both ZBI and IEQ. Results: Internal consistency was good and similar for both scales ( ZBI: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.94; IEQ: 0.86, 95% CI: 0. 83, 0.89). Convergent validity was relevant for similar domains ( e. g. ZBI total score vs IEQ- tension r = 0.69, 95% CI: 0. 61, 0.75) and at least moderate for the rest of domains ( ZBI total score, personal strain and role strain vs IEQ- urging and supervision). Discriminative validity against psychological distress and depressive symptoms was good ( Area Under the Curve [ AUC]: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.83; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.78 - for ZBI against GHQ- 28 and CES- D respectively; and AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.78; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.77 - for IEQ against GHQ- 28 and CES- D respectively). AUCs against the reference criteria did not differ significantly between the two scales. After the intervention, both scales showed a significant decrease at endpoint ( p- values < 0.001) with similar standardised effect sizes for change (- 0.36, 95% CI: - 0.58, - 0.15 - for ZBI; - 0.39, 95% CI: - 0.60, - 0.18 - for IEQ). Conclusions: Both ZBI and IEQ have shown satisfactory psychometric properties to assess caregiver burden in this sample. We provided further evidence on the performance of the ZBI as a general measure of subjective burden. The study was entirely funded by a public research grant (FIS PI10/01049, Spain).
- Subjects :
- psychometrics
Male
Psychometrics
cost of illness
Community
law.invention
randomized-trial
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Quality of life
Cost of Illness
law
Surveys and Questionnaires
Adaptation, Psychological
follow-up
030212 general & internal medicine
spanish population
Family caregivers
General Medicine
Caregiver burden
Middle Aged
Convergent validity
Caregivers
community
lcsh:R858-859.7
Female
schizophrenic-patient
family caregivers
Psychology
Clinical psychology
brain-injury
Adult
caregivers
medicine.medical_specialty
psychoeducational intervention
Schizoaffective disorder
mental-illness
lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
03 medical and health sciences
Interview, Psychological
medicine
general health questionnaire
Humans
Psychiatry
Aged
Research
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
medicine.disease
030227 psychiatry
schizophrenia
scale ces-d
Schizophrenia
Quality of Life
General Health Questionnaire
Stress, Psychological
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14777525
- Volume :
- 15
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....1bd54a8a7b8c21665fdede932df34f71
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0626-8