Back to Search Start Over

The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy

Authors :
Gregor K. Wenning
Iva Stankovic
Luca Vignatelli
Alessandra Fanciulli
Giovanna Calandra‐Buonaura
Klaus Seppi
Jose‐Alberto Palma
Wassilios G. Meissner
Florian Krismer
Daniela Berg
Pietro Cortelli
Roy Freeman
Glenda Halliday
Günter Höglinger
Anthony Lang
Helen Ling
Irene Litvan
Phillip Low
Yasuo Miki
Jalesh Panicker
Maria Teresa Pellecchia
Niall Quinn
Ryuji Sakakibara
Maria Stamelou
Eduardo Tolosa
Shoji Tsuji
Tom Warner
Werner Poewe
Horacio Kaufmann
Wenning, Gregor K
Stankovic, Iva
Vignatelli, Luca
Fanciulli, Alessandra
Calandra-Buonaura, Giovanna
Seppi, Klau
Palma, Jose-Alberto
Meissner, Wassilios G
Krismer, Florian
Berg, Daniela
Cortelli, Pietro
Freeman, Roy
Halliday, Glenda
Höglinger, Günter
Lang, Anthony
Ling, Helen
Litvan, Irene
Low, Phillip
Miki, Yasuo
Panicker, Jalesh
Pellecchia, Maria Teresa
Quinn, Niall
Sakakibara, Ryuji
Stamelou, Maria
Tolosa, Eduardo
Tsuji, Shoji
Warner, Tom
Poewe, Werner
Kaufmann, Horacio
Source :
Movement disorders 37(6), 1131-1148 (2022). doi:10.1002/mds.29005, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, vol 37, iss 6
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

BackgroundThe second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) are widely recognized as the reference standard for clinical research, but lack sensitivity to diagnose the disease at early stages.ObjectiveTo develop novel Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for MSA diagnosis using an evidence-based and consensus-based methodology.MethodsWe identified shortcomings of the second consensus criteria for MSA diagnosis and conducted a systematic literature review to answer predefined questions on clinical presentation and diagnostic tools relevant for MSA diagnosis. The criteria were developed and later optimized using two Delphi rounds within the MSA Criteria Revision Task Force, a survey for MDS membership, and a virtual Consensus Conference.ResultsThe criteria for neuropathologically established MSA remain unchanged. For a clinical MSA diagnosis a new category of clinically established MSA is introduced, aiming for maximum specificity with acceptable sensitivity. A category of clinically probable MSA is defined to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity. A research category of possible prodromal MSA is designed to capture patients in the earliest stages when symptoms and signs are present, but do not meet the threshold for clinically established or clinically probable MSA. Brain magnetic resonance imaging markers suggestive of MSA are required for the diagnosis of clinically established MSA. The number of research biomarkers that support all clinical diagnostic categories will likely grow.ConclusionsThis set of MDS MSA diagnostic criteria aims at improving the diagnostic accuracy, particularly in early disease stages. It requires validation in a prospective clinical and a clinicopathological study. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Details

ISSN :
15318257
Volume :
37
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1ba2583546b39bc3ef26d49424ecf593