Back to Search Start Over

Nutritional Index as Prognostic Indicator in Patients Receiving Lenvatinib Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Authors :
Hiroshi Shibata
Takashi Kumada
Kazuto Tajiri
Michitaka Imai
Masashi Hirooka
Atsushi Hiraoka
Norio Itokawa
Kunihiko Tsuji
Taeang Arai
Masatoshi Kudo
Kojiro Michitaka
Kazuya Kariyama
Shinya Fukunishi
Korenobu Hayama
Shinichiro Nakamura
Ei Itobayashi
Toru Ishikawa
Hironori Ochi
Yoichi Hiasa
Hideko Ohama
Akemi Tsutsui
Toshifumi Tada
Koichi Takaguchi
Masanori Atsukawa
Kazuhito Kawata
Noritomo Shimada
Hidenori Toyoda
Source :
Oncology. 98:295-302
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
S. Karger AG, 2020.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Few studies have examined the details of nutritional status in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) undergoing systemic chemotherapy with lenvatinib. We evaluated the prognostic/predictive value of nutritional status using Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (O-PNI) for overall survival among patients with u-HCC treated with lenvatinib. Methods: Three-hundred and seventy-five u-HCC patients treated with lenvatinib were enrolled (median age 72 years; Child-Pugh class A/B/C: n = 312/60/3; BCLC stage A/B/C/D: n = 2/159/212/2). We examined median survival time (MST) and time to progression (TTP) in all patients (n = 375), prognosis according to the O-PNI (high/low: >40/≤40) in 298 patients with lymphocyte findings, and the prognostic/predictive values of Child-Pugh stage, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI)/modified ALBI (mALBI) grade, and O-PNI for Chemotherapy grade (OPNIC grade 1/2/3: O-PNI >40/≤40 to >36/≤36). Results: The MST and TTP were 16.6 and 8.0 months, respectively. The MST and TTP according to the O-PNI (>40/≤40) were “not reached” (NR)/12.4 months (p < 0.001) and 10.0/6.1 months (p = 0.012), respectively. There was a good correlation noted between ALBI score and O-PNI (r = −0.939, p < 0.001). The predictive value of the O-PNI for mALBI grade 2a was 36.0 (specificity/sensitivity = 0.894/0.942; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.978), while that for mALBI grade 1 was 39 (specificity/sensitivity = 0.920/0.929; AUC = 0.972), which was very similar to a high O-PNI. The MST analyzed with the OPNIC in the 298 patients was NR/16.2/10.4 months for OPNIC grade 1/2/3 (p < 0.001), respectively, and the c-index was 0.632, the same as that for mALBI grade (0.632), while that for Child-Pugh class was 0.571. Conclusions: OPNIC grading might have a potential for easy substitution of mALBI grading. A good nutritional status (OPNIC grade 1) or mALBI grade 1 is the best indication for lenvatinib use, while with an OPNIC grade 3, lenvatinib might be not suitable.

Details

ISSN :
14230232 and 00302414
Volume :
98
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1b842979211246b06c839f16159da79b