Back to Search Start Over

A pilot study on automatic three-dimensional quantification of Barrett's esophagus for risk stratification and therapy monitoring

Authors :
Bruce George
Maryam Haghighat
Alessandra Geremia
Lucy Howarth
Fiona Powrie
Holm H. Uhlig
James E. East
E Barnes
Jane Collier
Sharib Ali
Paul Klenerman
Alissa Walsh
Kelsey D. J. Jones
Elizabeth L. Bird-Lieberman
Stephen Ash
Astor Rodrigues
Simon J. Leedham
Alison Simmons
Xin Lu
Carolina V Arancibia-Cárcamo
Philip Allan
Jan Bornschein
Simon Travis
Barbara Braden
Tim Ambrose
Rebecca Palmer
Jack Satsangi
Emma L. Culver
Adam A. Bailey
Jens Rittscher
Oliver Brain
Investigators, TGU
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Background & Aims Barrett’s epithelium measurement using widely accepted Prague C&M classification is highly operator dependent. We propose a novel methodology for measuring this risk score automatically. The method also enables quantification of the area of Barrett’s epithelium (BEA) and islands, which was not possible before. Furthermore, it allows 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the esophageal surface, enabling interactive 3D visualization. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the proposed artificial intelligence system on both phantom and endoscopic patient data. Methods Using advanced deep learning, a depth estimator network is used to predict endoscope camera distance from the gastric folds. By segmenting BEA and gastroesophageal junction and projecting them to the estimated mm distances, we measure C&M scores including the BEA. The derived endoscopy artificial intelligence system was tested on a purpose-built 3D printed esophagus phantom with varying BEAs and on 194 high-definition videos from 131 patients with C&M values scored by expert endoscopists. Results Endoscopic phantom video data demonstrated a 97.2% accuracy with a marginal ± 0.9 mm average deviation for C&M and island measurements, while for BEA we achieved 98.4% accuracy with only ±0.4 cm2 average deviation compared with ground-truth. On patient data, the C&M measurements provided by our system concurred with expert scores with marginal overall relative error (mean difference) of 8% (3.6 mm) and 7% (2.8 mm) for C and M scores, respectively. Conclusions The proposed methodology automatically extracts Prague C&M scores with high accuracy. Quantification and 3D reconstruction of the entire Barrett’s area provides new opportunities for risk stratification and assessment of therapy response.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1b291d23a0a869f1e0a4372d245196ea
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.059