Assessing outcomes and costs of appendectomies performed at rural hospitals

The purpose of our study was to assess the outcomes and costs of appendectomies performed at rural and urban hospitals.The National Inpatient Sample (2001-2012) was queried for appendectomies at urban and rural hospitals. Outcomes (disease severity, laparoscopy, complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost) were analyzed.Rural patients were more likely to be older, male, white, and have Medicaid or no insurance. Rural hospitals were associated with higher negative appendectomy rates (OR = 1.26,95%CI = 1.18-1.34,p 0.01), less laparoscopy use (OR = 0.65,95%CI = 0.58-0.72,p 0.01), and slightly shorter LOS (OR = 0.98,95%CI = 0.97-0.99,p 0.01). There was no consistent association with perforated appendicitis and no difference in complications or costs after adjusting for hospital volume. Yearly trends showed a significant increase in the cases utilizing laparoscopy each year at rural hospitals.Rural appendectomies are associated with increased negative appendectomy rates and less laparoscopy use with no difference in complications or costs compared to urban hospitals.