Back to Search Start Over

Young age under 60years is not a contraindication to treatment with definitive dose escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Authors :
David Y.T. Chen
Robert G. Uzzo
Alexander Kutikov
Tracy Klayton
Mark K. Buyyounouski
Mark L. Sobczak
Karen Ruth
Eric M. Horwitz
Source :
Radiotherapy and Oncology. 101:508-512
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2011.

Abstract

It is widely believed that younger prostate cancer patients are at greater risk of recurrence following radiotherapy (RT).From 1992 to 2007, 2168 (395 age ≤ 60) men received conformal RT alone for prostate cancer at our institution (median dose=76 Gy, range: 72-80). Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify significant predictors for BF and PCSM. Cumulative incidence was estimated using the competing risk method (Fine and Gray) for BF (Phoenix definition) and PCSM to account for the competing risk of death.With a median follow-up of 72.2 months (range: 24.0-205.1), 8-year BF was 27.1% for age ≤ 60 vs. 23.7% for age60 (p=0.29). Eight-year PCSM was 3.0% for age ≤ 60 vs. 2.0% for age60 (p=0.52). MVA for BF identified initial PSA [adjusted HR=1.7 (PSA 10-20), 2.6 (PSA20), p0.01], Gleason score [adjusted HR=2.1 (G7), 1.9 (G8-10), p0.01], T-stage [adjusted HR=1.7 (T2b-c), 2.6 (T3-4), p0.01], and initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [adjusted HR=0.38 (ADT12 months), p0.01] as significant, but not age or ADT12 months. MVA for PCSM identified Gleason score [adjusted HR=3.0 (G8-10), p=0.01] and T-stage [adjusted HR=8.7 (T3-4), p0.01] as significant, but not age, PSA, or ADT.This is the largest, most mature study of younger men treated with RT for prostate cancer that confirms young age is not prognostic for BF.

Details

ISSN :
01678140
Volume :
101
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1ae2483dce67afc5a7b5264ec2b6682b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.022