Back to Search Start Over

Tris-chelated complexes of nickel(II) with bipyridine derivatives: DNA binding and cleavage, BSA binding, molecular docking, and cytotoxicity

Authors :
Farangis Ataei
Bagher Amirheidari
Jan Janczak
Mehdi Ansari
Corrado Rizzoli
Masoud Torkzadeh-Mahani
Monireh Dehkhodaei
Mehdi Sahihi
Marzieh Anjomshoa
Sheila Sherafat Esfahani
Pharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman
Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman
University of Isfahan
Department of Chemistry, University of Isfahan, Isfahan
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability [Parma]
Università degli studi di Parma = University of Parma (UNIPR)
Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research [Polish Academy of Sciences]
Polska Akademia Nauk = Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN)
Tarbiat Modares University [Tehran]
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran
Source :
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 2019, 37 (15), pp.3887-3904. ⟨10.1080/07391102.2018.1534700⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Taylor & Francis, 2019.

Abstract

Two nickel(II) complexes with substituted bipyridine ligand of the type [Ni(NN)3](ClO4)2, where NN is 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine (dimethylbpy) (1) and 4,4′-dimethoxy-2,2′-bipyridine (dimethoxybpy) (2), have been synthesized, characterized, and their interaction with DNA and bovine serum albumin (BSA) studied by different physical methods. X-ray crystal structure of 1 shows a six-coordinate complex in a distorted octahedral geometry. DNA-binding studies of 1 and 2 reveal that both complexes sit in DNA groove and then interact with neighboring nucleotides differently; 2 undergoes a partial intercalation. This is supported by molecular-docking studies, where hydrophobic interactions are apparent between 1 and DNA as compared to hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, and π–π interactions between 2 and DNA minor groove. Moreover, the two complexes exhibit oxidative cleavage of supercoiled plasmid DNA in the presence of hydrogen peroxide as an activator in the order of 1 > 2. In terms of interaction with BSA, the results of spectroscopic methods and molecular docking show that 1 binds with BSA only via hydrophobic contacts while 2 interacts through hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding. It has been extensively demonstrated that the nature of the methyl- and methoxy-groups in ligands is a strong determinant of the bioactivity of nickel(II) complexes. This may justify the above differences in biomolecular interactions. In addition, the in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes on human carcinoma cells lines (MCF-7, HT-29, and U-87) has been examined by MTT assay. According to our observations, 1 and 2 display cytotoxicity activity against selected cell lines. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Details

ISSN :
07391102 and 15380254
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 2019, 37 (15), pp.3887-3904. ⟨10.1080/07391102.2018.1534700⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....19bb9d0917deb53e32b5b9e05c163bcc
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7675988.v1