Back to Search Start Over

A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients

Authors :
George P. Kim
David Z. Chang
Daniel D. Von Hoff
Philip J. Stella
Berta Laquente
Karla Hurt
Tudor Ciuleanu
Cezary Szcylik
Jose A. Lopez-Martin
Scott M. Hynes
Aimee Bence Lin
Dirk J. Richel
Emiliano Calvo
Giovanni Luca Frassineti
Ji Lin
Donald A. Richards
Gerald Illerhaus
Stefano Cascinu
Oncology
Cancer Center Amsterdam
CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
Laquente, B.
Lopez-Martin, J.
Richards, D.
Illerhaus, G.
Chang, D. Z.
Kim, G.
Stella, P.
Richel, D.
Szcylik, C.
Cascinu, S.
Frassineti, G. L.
Ciuleanu, T.
Hurt, K.
Hynes, S.
Lin, J.
Lin, A. B.
Hoff, D.
Calvo, E.
Source :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, BMC cancer, 17(1). BioMed Central, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, BMC Cancer
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
BioMed Central, 2017.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether checkpoint kinase 1 inihibitor (CHK1), LY2603618, and gemcitabine prolong overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Patients with Stage II-IV locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized (2:1) to either 230 mg of LY2603618/1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine combined or 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine alone. OS was assessed using both a Bayesian augment control model and traditional frequentist analysis for inference. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [AEs] v 3.0) were also evaluated. Ninety-nine patients (n = 65, LY2603618/gemcitabine; n = 34, gemcitabine) were randomized (intent-to-treat population). The median OS (months) was 7.8 (range, 0.3–18.9) with LY2603618/gemcitabine and 8.3 (range, 0.8-19.1+) with gemcitabine. Similarly, in a Bayesian analysis, the study was not positive since the posterior probability that LY2603618/gemcitabine was superior to gemcitabine in improving OS was 0.3, which did not exceed the prespecified threshold of 0.8. No significant improvements in PFS, ORR, or duration of response were observed. Drug-related treatment-emergent AEs in both arms included nausea, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and neutropenia. The severity of AEs with LY2603618/gemcitabine was comparable to gemcitabine. The LY2603618 exposure targets (AUC(0-∞) ≥21,000 ng∙hr/mL and Cmax ≥2000 ng/mL) predicted for maximum pharmacodynamic response were achieved after 230 mg of LY2603618. LY2603618/gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. NCT00839332 . Clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 6 February 2009

Details

ISSN :
14712407
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, BMC cancer, 17(1). BioMed Central, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, BMC Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....19a270d98056a450651be2deafc39661