Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Lercanidipine/Valsartan Combination in Korean Patients With Essential Hypertension Not Adequately Controlled With Lercanidipine Monotherapy: A Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel Design, Phase III Clinical Trial

Authors :
Sang Hong Baek
Byung Hee Oh
Sang Wook Kim
Chang Gyu Park
Eun-Seok Shin
Dong-Ju Choi
Jun Kwan
Seung Uk Lee
Myung Ho Jeong
Jae Kean Ryu
Sung Hee John
Jae Joong Kim
Seung Hwan Lee
Sungha Park
Moo Yong Rhee
Woo Jung Park
Sung Yun Lee
Taehoon Ahn
Joon-Han Shin
Nam Ho Lee
Jae Hyeon Juhn
Yoon Nyun Kim
Jin Ok Jeong
Yu Jeong Lee
Kyung Heon Won
Taek Jong Hong
Jeong Cheon Ahn
Eun Seok Jeon
Dong Woon Kim
Sun-Young Kim
Moo Hyun Kim
Hae Young Lee
Sukkeun Hong
Jang Hyun Cho
Jin Ho Kang
Dong Hun Cha
Seong Wook Cho
Nam-Ho Kim
Sang Yong Yoo
Song-Yi Kim
Byung Soo Kim
Hui Kyung Jeon
Soon Kil Kim
Sang Hoon Na
Source :
Clinical Therapeutics. 37:1726-1739
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the lercanidipine/valsartan combination compared with lercanidipine monotherapy in patients with hypertension.Part 1 of this study was the randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel group, Phase III, 8-week clinical trial to compare superiority of lercanidipine 10 mg/valsartan 80 mg (L10/V80) and lercanidipine 10 mg/valsartan 160 mg (L10/V160) combinations with lercanidipine 10 mg (L10) monotherapy. At screening, hypertensive patients, whose diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was90 mm Hg after 4 weeks with L10, were randomized to 3 groups of L10, L10/V80, and L10/V160. The primary end point was the change in the mean sitting DBP from baseline (week 0) after 8 weeks of therapy. Patients who were randomly assigned to L10/V160 and whose mean DBP was still ≥ 90 mm Hg in part 1 were enrolled to the up-titration extension study with lercanidipine 20 mg/valsartan 160 mg (L20/V160) (part 2).Of 772 patients screened, 497 were randomized to 3 groups (166 in the L10 group, 168 in the L10/V80 group, and 163 in the L10/V160 group). Mean (SD) age was 55 (9.9) years, and male patients comprised 69%. The mean (SD) baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP)/DBP were 148.4 (15.1)/94.3 (9.5) mm Hg. No significant differences were found between groups in baseline characteristics except the percentages of previous history of antihypertensive medication. The primary end points, the changes of mean (SD) DBP at week 8 from the baseline were -2.0 (8.8) mm Hg in the L10 group, -6.7 (8.5) mm Hg in L10/V80 group, and -8.1 (8.4) mm Hg in L10/V160 group. The adjusted mean difference between the combination groups and the L10 monotherapy group was -4.6 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.5 to -2.6; P0.001) in the L10/V80 group and -5.9 mm Hg (95% CI, -7.9 to -4.0, P0.001) in the L10/V160 group, which had significantly greater efficacy in BP lowering. A total of 74 patients were enrolled in the part 2 extension study. Changes of mean (SD) DBP and SBP from week 8 to week 12 and week 16 were -5.6 (7.9)/-8.0 (12.0) mm Hg and -5.5 (7.0)/-8.5 (11.3) mm Hg, respectively. For evaluation of the safety profile, the frequencies of adverse events between groups were also not significantly different. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache (6 cases, 20.7%) in the L10 group, dizziness (8 cases, 16.3%) in L10/V80 group, and nasopharyngitis (3 cases, 9.4%) in L10/V160 group, and the incidences of adverse events were not different between groups.Treatment of L10/V80 or L10/V160 combination therapy resulted in significantly greater BP lowering compared with L10 monotherapy. Moreover, the L20/V160 high dose combination had additional BP lowering effect compared with nonresponders with the L10/V160 combination. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01928628.

Details

ISSN :
01492918
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Therapeutics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1985b307fae3cdc68fe0cf3e95e0ba2c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.512