Back to Search Start Over

Clinical and exploratory biomarker findings from the MODUL trial (Cohorts 1, 3 and 4) of biomarker-driven maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Authors :
Michel Ducreux
Josep Tabernero
Axel Grothey
Dirk Arnold
Peter J. O'Dwyer
Frank Gilberg
Alexander Abbas
Meghna Das Thakur
Hen Prizant
Natsumi Irahara
Anila Tahiri
Hans-Joachim Schmoll
Eric Van Cutsem
Aimery de Gramont
Institut Català de la Salut
[Ducreux M] Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. [Tabernero J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain. [Grothey A] West Cancer Center, Germantown, TN, USA. [Arnold D] Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany. [O'Dwyer PJ] Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. [Gilberg F] F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Source :
Scientia
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt, 2023.

Abstract

Biomarkers; Colorectal cancer; Maintenance therapy Biomarcadors; Càncer colorectal; Teràpia de manteniment Biomarcadores; Cáncer colorrectal; Terapia de mantenimiento Purpose MODUL is an adaptable, signal-seeking trial of biomarker-driven maintenance therapy following first-line induction treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We report findings from Cohorts 1 (BRAFmut), 3 (human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2]+) and 4 (HER2‒/high microsatellite instability, HER2‒/microsatellite stable [MSS]/BRAFwt or HER2‒/MSS/BRAFmut/RASmut). Methods Patients with unresectable, previously untreated mCRC without disease progression following standard induction treatment (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin [5-FU/LV] plus oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab) were randomly assigned to control (fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab) or cohort-specific experimental maintenance therapy (Cohort 1: vemurafenib plus cetuximab plus 5-FU/LV; Cohort 3: capecitabine plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab; Cohort 4: cobimetinib plus atezolizumab). The primary efficacy end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Cohorts 1, 3 and 4 did not reach target sample size because of early study closure. In Cohort 1 (n = 60), PFS did not differ between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence intervals 0.50–1.82; P = 0.872). However, Cohort 1 exploratory biomarker data showed preferential selection for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway mutations (mainly KRAS, NRAS, MAP2K1 or BRAF) in the experimental arm but not the control arm. In Cohort 3 (n = 5), PFS ranged from 3.6 to 14.7 months versus 4.0 to 5.4 months in the experimental and control arms, respectively. In Cohort 4 (n = 99), PFS was shorter in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence intervals 0.90–2.29; P = 0.128). Conclusions Vemurafenib plus cetuximab plus 5-FU/LV warrants further investigation as first-line maintenance treatment for BRAFmut mCRC. MAPK-pathway emergent genomic alterations may offer novel therapeutic opportunities in BRAFmut mCRC. Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab had an unfavourable benefit:risk ratio in HER2‒/MSS/BRAFwt mCRC. New strategies are required to increase the susceptibility of MSS mCRC to immunotherapy. This work was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scientia
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1928ff25405d828ae1ca88ab540d68af
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.25673/108976