Back to Search
Start Over
Toxicity evaluation by using intact sediments and sediment extracts
- Source :
- Marine pollution bulletin. 50(6)
- Publication Year :
- 2005
-
Abstract
- The toxicity of intact sediments and sediment extracts, from both an uncontaminated site and a site contaminated by pulp-mill effluents, was tested in a five months study. The deposit-feeding amphipod Monoporeia affinis was exposed in soft-bottom flow-through water microcosms. To examine potential toxicity a set of reproduction endpoints was used including fecundity and different embryo aberrations such as malformed eggs. Among extracts, the aliphatic/monoaromatic and diaromatic fractions along with the total extract were shown to cause the highest toxicity measured as malformed eggs, while the polyaromatic fraction caused toxicity at background levels. A comparison between sediment extracts and pulp mill contaminated intact sediment, however, showed no toxicity of the intact sediment. Thus, the extraction procedure seems to increase bioavailability and subsequently toxicity as compared to the intact sediments in situ. In toxicity testing using fractionated extracts of sediments in a toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) procedures, caution should therefore be taken when assessing bioavailable contaminants in contaminated areas. This should be taken in account both in determining remediation priorities as well as in ecological risk assessments.
- Subjects :
- Paper
Geologic Sediments
Environmental remediation
Embryonic Development
Aquatic Science
Oceanography
Waste Disposal, Fluid
Toxicity Tests
Ecotoxicology
Animals
Amphipoda
Water pollution
Sweden
biology
Chemistry
Reproduction
Sediment
biology.organism_classification
Pollution
Hydrocarbons
Bioavailability
Logistic Models
Environmental chemistry
Toxicity
Monoporeia
Environmental Pollutants
Microcosm
Environmental Monitoring
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 0025326X
- Volume :
- 50
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Marine pollution bulletin
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....18b2faf429c839ed0995834380fe20ae