Back to Search Start Over

'Complex abdominal wall' management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference

Authors :
Piccoli, Micaela
Agresta, Ferdinando
Attinà, Grazia Maria
Amabile, Dalia
Marchi, Domenico
Bergamini, Carlo
Berta, Rossana
Boccia, Luigi
Cuccurullo, Diego
Fiscon, Valentino
Gossetti, Francesco
Ipponi, Pierluigi
Riccipetitoni, Giovanna
Rimini, Massimiliano
Russello, Domenico
Trapani, Vincenzo
Tricarico, Fausto
Tugnoli, Gregorio
Melotti, Gianluigi
Ansaloni, Luca
Barlera, Simona
Beghelli, Davide
Campanelli, Giampiero
Campanile, Fabio Cesare
Carlucci, Michele
Casarano, Salvatore
Chiara, Osvaldo
Chirletti, Piero
Corcione, Francesco
Crovella, Feliciano
Davoli, Marina
Gianetta, Ezio
Giordani, Stefano
Hervatin, Rita
Longoni, Mauro
Maida, Pietro
Marini, Pierluigi
Munegato, Gabriele
Negro, Paolo
Pelosi, Paolo
Piazza, Diego
Presenti, Luigi
Rea, Roberto
Sartelli, Massimo
Testini, Mario
Valeri, Andrea
Vettoretto, Nereo
Vincenti, Rodolfo
Source :
Updates in Surgery
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

To date, there is no shared consensus on a definition of a complex abdominal wall in elective surgery and in the emergency, on indications, technical details, complications, and follow-up. The purpose of the conference was to lay the foundations for a homogeneous approach to the complex abdominal wall with the primary intent being to attain the following objectives: (1) to develop evidence-based recommendations to define “complex abdominal wall”; (2) indications in emergency and in elective cases; (3) management of “complex abdominal wall”; (4) techniques for temporary abdominal closure. The decompressive laparostomy should be considered in a case of abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with critical conditions or after the failure of a medical treatment or less invasive methods. In the second one, beyond different mechanism, patients with surgical emergency diseases might reach the same pathophysiological end point of trauma patients where a preventive “open abdomen” might be indicated (a temporary abdominal closure: in the case of a non-infected field, the Wittmann patch and the NPWT had the best outcome followed by meshes; in the case of an infected field, NPWT techniques seem to be the preferred). The second priority is to create optimal both general as local conditions for healing: the right antimicrobial management, feeding—preferably by the enteral route—and managing correctly the open abdomen wall. The use of a mesh appears to be—if and when possible—the gold standard. There is a lot of enthusiasm about biological meshes. But the actual evidence supports their use only in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields but above all, to reduce the higher rate of recurrences, the wall anatomy and function should be restored in the midline, with or without component separation technique. On the other site has not to be neglected that the use of monofilament and macroporous non-absorbable meshes, in extraperitoneal position, in the setting of the complex abdomen with contamination, seems to have a cost effective role too. The idea of this consensus conference was mainly to try to bring order in the so copious, but not always so “evident” literature utilizing and exchanging the expertise of different specialists.

Details

ISSN :
20383312
Volume :
71
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Updates in surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1812140569e357e60f499bef894eaf58