Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Immunoassays for Measuring Serum Levels of Golimumab and Antibodies Against Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Observational Study

Authors :
Ann Gils
Anne-Emmanuelle Berger
Stéphane Nancey
Iris Detrez
Freddy Cornillie
Annick de Vries
Gérard Duru
Stéphane Paul
Joseph C. Marini
Xavier Roblin
Djamila Aoucheta
Source :
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 41:459-466
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2019.

Abstract

Golimumab is a monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, which is used in ulcerative colitis with an exposure-response relationship. The goal of this study was to compare results obtained with different immunoassays (golimumab and antigolimumab antibodies trough levels).This study was based on samples from 78 ulcerative colitis patients on golimumab treatment. Golimumab was quantified by either an anti-IgG detection antibody (Theradiag, Marne la Vallée, France) or an antibody directed against golimumab (Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and Janssen RD, San Diego, CA). Bridging drug-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Theradiag, Janssen RD, and KU Leuven), a bridging drug-tolerant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Janssen RD), and a radioimmunoassay (Sanquin) were used to quantify antidrug antibody.Median serum golimumab levels were 4.5, 3.5, 4.9, and 2.4 mcg/mL with Theradiag, Sanquin, KU Leuven, and Janssen RD assay, respectively (P0.05). Correlation coefficients between assays ranged from 0.9 to 0.97. When using the KU Leuven and Janssen RD assays, 86% of samples were in the same quartile of distribution of values, and for Sanquin and Janssen RD assays, this overlap was 80%. The concordance observed for the other pairs was 83% (Sanquin/KU Leuven RD), 71% (Theradiag/KU Leuven), and 68% (Theradiag/Janssen RD and Theradiag/Sanquin). The specificity of assays for golimumab was demonstrated. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 28.2% of the samples with the Janssen RD drug-tolerant assay and in the same 2 patients by the 3 other assays.Performances of these immunoassays were similar in terms of quality, but differences in the quantitative results point to the importance of using the same assay consistently to monitor a patient's treatment.

Details

ISSN :
01634356
Volume :
41
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....16ce5fe8d8c507a458cfaa4689eed38c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000629