Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 and 18F-Fluorodeoxyribose-Siglec-9: Inflammation Imaging and Radiation Dosimetry

Authors :
Sanna Hellberg
Riikka Siitonen
Mia Ståhle
Juhani Knuuti
Meeri Käkelä
Sirpa Jalkanen
Johanna M. U. Silvola
Xiang-Guo Li
Kerttuli Helariutta
Anne Roivainen
Tuula Tolvanen
Heidi Liljenbäck
Helena E. Virtanen
Anu Autio
Antti Saraste
Tibor Z. Veres
Anu J. Airaksinen
Department of Chemistry
Tracers in Molecular Imaging (TRIM)
Source :
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, Vol 2017 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Hindawi, 2017.

Abstract

Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 9 (Siglec-9) is a ligand of inflammation-inducible vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1). We compared 68Ga-DOTA- and 18F-fluorodeoxyribose- (FDR-) labeled Siglec-9 motif peptides for PET imaging of inflammation. Methods. Firstly, we examined 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 and 18F-FDR-Siglec-9 in rats with skin/muscle inflammation. We then studied 18F-FDR-Siglec-9 for the detection of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques in mice and compared it with previous 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 results. Lastly, we estimated human radiation dosimetry from the rat data. Results. In rats, 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 (SUV, 0.88±0.087) and 18F-FDR-Siglec-9 (SUV, 0.77±0.22) showed comparable (P=0.29) imaging of inflammation. In atherosclerotic mice, 18F-FDR-Siglec-9 detected inflamed plaques with a target-to-background ratio (1.6±0.078) similar to previously tested 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 (P=0.35). Human effective dose estimates for 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 and 18F-FDR-Siglec-9 were 0.024 and 0.022 mSv/MBq, respectively. Conclusion. Both tracers are suitable for PET imaging of inflammation. The easier production and lower cost of 68Ga-DOTA-Siglec-9 present advantages over 18F-FDR-Siglec-9, indicating it as a primary choice for clinical studies.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15554309
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....163d8d0c4b8389c62a46ff6cbe252493
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7645070