Back to Search
Start Over
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Ambulatory Surgery Centers
- Source :
- SPINE. 41:686-692
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2016.
-
Abstract
- Study design Comparative analysis. Objective To evaluate the safety and outcomes of moving lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgeries to an outpatient setting. Summary of background data LLIF has been popularized as a less invasive lumbar fusion surgery as an alternative approach to anterior lumbar interbody fusions, posterior lateral interbody fusion, and transforaminal lateral interbody fusion (TLIF). Lumbar fusions have been traditionally performed in a hospital setting because of the potential blood loss, length of surgery, and need for longer recovery. There is a movement to transition spine surgeries to outpatient settings with many benefits afforded by less invasive techniques and technologies. Methods The medical records of 70 consecutive patients with prospectively collected data were retrospectively reviewed. Two cohort groups, inpatients (40 patients) and outpatients (30 patients), were created. Patient demographics, risk factors, and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated to determine inclusion criteria for study. Result A total of 34 males and 36 females, age range (31-71) average 59.3 ± 2.3 years. Average BMI was 29.6 ± 1.1 kg/m. The most common level operated on being L3-L4 in both groups (63%). Mean preoperative inpatient Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) increased from 48.5 ± 3.0 to 55.5 ± 3.2 compared with outpatient preoperative ODI means reduced from 45.2 ± 5.1 to 39.1 ± 4.6. There was no statistically significant change in VAS scores between groups. There was however significant improvement in outpatient preoperative VAS scores from 7.3 ± 0.5 to 4.1 ± 0.5, P = 0.045. Conclusion The outcomes of the present study have shown that patients who had LLIF performed in the outpatient setting had statistically significant improvement in ODI scores compared with the inpatient setting (P = 0.013). Fusion was achieved in all patients and there was no evidence of implant failure or subsidence. Complications were transient in both settings. We conclude that outpatient LLIF improves patients' outcomes with similar safety profile as the hospital setting. Level of evidence 3.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Lumbar vertebrae
03 medical and health sciences
Postoperative Complications
0302 clinical medicine
Lumbar
Humans
Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Lumbar Vertebrae
business.industry
Patient Selection
Retrospective cohort study
Middle Aged
Ambulatory Surgical Procedure
Oswestry Disability Index
Surgery
Spinal Fusion
Treatment Outcome
medicine.anatomical_structure
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Spinal fusion
Anesthesia
Ambulatory
Cohort
Female
Neurology (clinical)
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03622436
- Volume :
- 41
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- SPINE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....1604bc7e4b2d238979bc23074c9c1702
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001285