Back to Search Start Over

Screening for Occult Cancer in Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism

Authors :
Marc, Carrier
Alejandro, Lazo-Langner
Sudeep, Shivakumar
Vicky, Tagalakis
Ryan, Zarychanski
Susan, Solymoss
Nathalie, Routhier
James, Douketis
Kim, Danovitch
Agnes Y, Lee
Gregoire, Le Gal
Philip S, Wells
Daniel J, Corsi
Timothy, Ramsay
Doug, Coyle
Isabelle, Chagnon
Zahra, Kassam
Hardy, Tao
Marc A, Rodger
A Y, Lee
Thrombosis Program
University of Ottawa [Ottawa]
Department of Medecine (OTTAWA - Dpt Med)
Department of Medecine [Montréal]
McGill University = Université McGill [Montréal, Canada]
Department of Medicine (DM - McMaster)
McMaster University [Hamilton, Ontario]
Arizona Geological Survey
Service d'angiologie et d'hémostase (MR)
Hôpital Universitaire de Genève
Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale (GETBO)
Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut Brestois Santé Agro Matière (IBSAM)
Université de Brest (UBO)-Université de Brest (UBO)
Clinical Epidemiology Unit
Ottawa-The Ottawa Hospital
University College Dublin [Dublin] (UCD)
Department of Medicine
University of Montreal
Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials Science and Engineering
WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
Haematology
Clinical Epidemiology Program (PSW)
The Ottawa Health Research Institute
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2015, 373 (8), pp.697-704. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1506623⟩
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2015.

Abstract

International audience; Venous thromboembolism may be the earliest sign of cancer. Currently, there is a great diversity in practices regarding screening for occult cancer in a person who has an unprovoked venous thromboembolism. We sought to assess the efficacy of a screening strategy for occult cancer that included comprehensive computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis in patients who had a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial in Canada. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo limited occult-cancer screening (basic blood testing, chest radiography, and screening for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer) or limited occult-cancer screening in combination with CT. The primary outcome measure was confirmed cancer that was missed by the screening strategy and detected by the end of the 1-year follow-up period. Of the 854 patients who underwent randomization, 33 (3.9%) had a new diagnosis of occult cancer between randomization and the 1-year follow-up: 14 of the 431 patients (3.2%) in the limited-screening group and 19 of the 423 patients (4.5%) in the limited-screening-plus-CT group (P=0.28). In the primary outcome analysis, 4 occult cancers (29%) were missed by the limited screening strategy, whereas 5 (26%) were missed by the strategy of limited screening plus CT (P=1.0). There was no significant difference between the two study groups in the mean time to a cancer diagnosis (4.2 months in the limited-screening group and 4.0 months in the limited-screening-plus-CT group, P=0.88) or in cancer-related mortality (1.4% and 0.9%, P=0.75). The prevalence of occult cancer was low among patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Routine screening with CT of the abdomen and pelvis did not provide a clinically significant benefit. (Funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; SOME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00773448.).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00284793 and 15334406
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2015, 373 (8), pp.697-704. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1506623⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....15fc64390c4ebd0c6ca1ec3063914d3b