Back to Search
Start Over
Biobanking in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond: Part 2. A Set of Tool Implementation Case Studies
- Source :
- Biopreserv Biobank, Biopreservation and Biobanking, Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal, Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP), instacron:RCAAP, Biopreservation and biobanking
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, 2020.
-
Abstract
- The COVID-19 era has brought about a number of novel challenges for the global biobanking community. An array of diverse tools (e.g., standards, best practices, and plans) exists to support quality and fitness-for-purpose in biobank operations. The International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) COVID-19 Response Task Force has set out to identify needs and gaps in these tools and make recommendations for the next generation of available tools, having closely examined the COVID-19-related challenges. While conducting this work to examine the relationships between tools and biobank adaptability, a subgroup of the task force conducted a parallel effort to develop and describe individual COVID-19 era case studies based on a number of operating biobanks. Each case study presents a different combination of implemented tools. Observations and lessons learned from these case studies are provided, and experiences with tool implementation are discussed. This information is supplemented by data relating to tool usefulness that was obtained through an ISBER survey discussed in a companion article. The knowledge gained from this study will be combined with other task force efforts to make recommendations to better position the biobanking community in their response to future emergencies.<br />This study was performed by a Task Force organized by members of the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Standards Advisory Committee. The authors gratefully acknowledge our fellow ISBER COVID-19 tools Task Force members who reviewed this article, developed figures and tables, and provided valuable feedback, particularly Daniel Simeon-Dubach, Rebecca Pugh, Sergey Anisimov, and Yehudit Cohen. Shannon McCall and the Duke University BioRepository & Precision Pathology Center receive funding from the United States National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute under UM1CA239755 (The Cooperative Human Tissue Network) and P30CA014236 (Duke University’s Cancer Center Support Grant).<br />info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Subjects :
- Biobanking
Standards
Biomedical Research
Computer science
media_common.quotation_subject
Best practice
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Adaptability
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Tools
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Humans
Quality (business)
Set (psychology)
Biology
Pandemics
Conformity assessment
media_common
Biological Specimen Banks
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
Science & Technology
SARS-CoV-2
0402 animal and dairy science
COVID-19
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
Cell Biology
General Medicine
Original Articles
040201 dairy & animal science
Data science
Biobank
Quality management system
Chemistry
Work (electrical)
Human medicine
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19475535
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Biopreserv Biobank, Biopreservation and Biobanking, Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal, Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP), instacron:RCAAP, Biopreservation and biobanking
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....15cde154d01044675ea8e6c05e717808