Back to Search Start Over

Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure with Two Different Approaches

Authors :
Andrea Annoni
Marco Guglielmo
Giuseppe Muscogiuri
Luca Di Odoardo
Alberto Formenti
Eleonora Melotti
Daniele Andreini
Edoardo Conte
Saima Mushtaq
Antonio L. Bartorelli
Andrea Baggiano
Maria Elisabetta Mancini
Cesare Fiorentini
Elisa Consiglio
Gianluca Pontone
Margarida Oliveira
Mauro Pepi
Marco Magatelli
Mushtaq, S
Pontone, G
Conte, E
Guglielmo, M
Consiglio, E
Magatelli, M
Oliveira, M
Muscogiuri, G
Annoni, A
Baggiano, A
Formenti, A
Mancini, M
Di Odoardo, L
Melotti, E
Fiorentini, C
Bartorelli, A
Pepi, M
Andreini, D
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: To evaluate image quality, coronary interpretability and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)performed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)with the latest scanner generation, comparing two different technical approaches. A new scanner that combines a 0.23 mm spatial resolution, a new generation of iterative reconstruction, fast gantry rotation time and the intracycle motion-correction algorithm to improve the temporal resolution was recently introduced in the clinical field. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 105 consecutive patients with chronic AF who performed CCTA with a whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner (16-cm z-axis coverage with 256 detector rows, 0.28 s gantry rotation time). Five of them were excluded for impaired renal function. Patients were randomized between a double acquisition protocol (50 patients, group 1)or a single acquisition protocol (50 patients, group 2). The image quality, coronary segment interpretability and effective dose (ED)of CCTA were assessed. Results: The mean HR during the scan was 85.6±21 bpm in group 1 vs. 83.7±23 bpm in Group 2, respectively (p < ns). In group 2, overall image quality was high and comparable with that of group 1 (Likert scale =3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 3.3 ± 1.2, p = ns, in group 1 and 2, respectively). Coronary interpretability was high and similar between the two groups (97.5% and 97.1% in group 1 and 2, p = ns, respectively). Mean ED was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (5.3 ± 1.8 mSv vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mSv, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to perform CCTA with a single-acquisition protocol with high image quality and low radiation exposure in AF patients.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....135447f17ebf0dd3a1a1dc0db9c1627e