Back to Search Start Over

Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review

Authors :
Stephan Ehrmann
Thierry Sottiaux
Thierry Dugernier
Jonathan Dugernier
François Jamar
Pierre-François Laterre
Jean Roeseler
Gregory Reychler
Xavier Wittebole
UCL - SSS/IREC/MEDA - Pôle de médecine aiguë
UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie
UCL - SSS/IREC/PNEU - Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL et Dermatologie
UCL - (SLuc) Service de soins intensifs
UCL - (SLuc) Service de médecine nucléaire
UCL - (SLuc) Service de médecine physique et de réadaptation motrice
UCL - (SLuc) Service de pneumologie
Centre d’Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires (CEPR), UMR 1100 (CEPR)
Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Soins intensifs-Unité médico-chirurgicale
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc [Bruxelles]
Cliniques universitaires St Luc [Bruxelles]
Department of Intensive Care
St-Pierre Hospital
Service de Médecine Nucléaire Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL)
Service Pneumologie Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
Ehrmann, Stephan
Université de Tours-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Source :
Critical Care, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017), Critical care, Vol. 21, p. 264 [1-11] (2017), Critical Care, Critical Care, BioMed Central, 2017, 21 (1), ⟨10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5⟩
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
BMC, 2017.

Abstract

Background This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. Methods In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. Results Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406–12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. Conclusions Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535 and 1466609X
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Critical Care
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....127c7c1b986679fd3e4e9ddb8530a3d1