Back to Search
Start Over
Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
- Source :
- Critical Care, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017), Critical care, Vol. 21, p. 264 [1-11] (2017), Critical Care, Critical Care, BioMed Central, 2017, 21 (1), ⟨10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Background This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. Methods In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. Results Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406–12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. Conclusions Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Subjects :
- Ventilator circuit
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Scintigraphy
[SDV.MHEP.PSR]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Pulmonology and respiratory tract
03 medical and health sciences
Drug Delivery Systems
0302 clinical medicine
Bronchodilators
In vivo
Antibiotics
Administration, Inhalation
medicine
Humans
Lung
Aerosols
Mechanical ventilation
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Research
Nebulizer
lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
lcsh:RC86-88.9
Respiration, Artificial
3. Good health
Surgery
medicine.anatomical_structure
030228 respiratory system
Amikacin
Anesthesia
[SDV.MHEP.PSR] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Pulmonology and respiratory tract
business
Deposition (chemistry)
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 13648535 and 1466609X
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Critical Care
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....127c7c1b986679fd3e4e9ddb8530a3d1