Back to Search Start Over

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Radiologic Management of Hepatic Malignancy

Authors :
Ross A. Abrams
Waddah B. Al-Refaie
Jason W Pinchot
Eric J. Hohenwalter
Kenneth J. Kolbeck
Ron C. Gaba
James Farrell
Debra A. Gervais
Brian E. Kouri
Francis E. Marshalleck
Matthew G. Gipson
Charles E. Ray
William Small
Nilofer Azad
Source :
Journal of the American College of Radiology. 13:265-273
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2016.

Abstract

Management of primary and secondary hepatic malignancy is a complex problem. Achieving optimal care for this challenging population often requires the involvement of multiple medical and surgical disciplines. Because of the wide variety of potential therapies, treatment protocols for various malignancies continue to evolve. Consequently, development of appropriate therapeutic algorithms necessitates consideration of medical options, such as systemic chemotherapy; surgical options, such as resection or transplantation; and loco-regional therapies, such as thermal ablation and transarterial embolization techniques. This article provides a review of treatment strategies for the three most common subtypes of hepatic malignancy treated with loco-regional therapies: hepatocellular carcinoma, neuroendocrine metastases, and colorectal metastases. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Details

ISSN :
15461440
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....11cdd2ecae6a0bf9635a90d2aaed13d5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.001