Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of cord blood lactate measurement by gas analyzer and portable electrochemical devices

Authors :
Gennady T. Sukhikh
Andrey Prikhodko
Andrey Yurievich Romanov
E.L. Yarotskaya
O. R. Baev
Oleg Vladimirovich Tysyachnyi
Source :
Journal of perinatal medicineReferences. 48(2)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the accuracy of cord blood lactate measurement using gas analyzer and portable devices in order to assess possibility of implementation of these devices in clinical practice.MethodsWe performed a prospective observational study using 30 umbilical cord samples which were obtained immediately after birth. Portable electrochemical devices Lactate Scout (SensLab GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) and StatStrip Lactate (NOVA Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA) were used to determine lactate level. A gas analyzer ABL800 FLEX (Radiometer Medical ApS, Brønshøj-Husum, Denmark) was used as a reference. Base excess (BE), pH, partial oxygen (pO2) and carbon dioxide (pCO2) pressure, hemoglobin (ctHb) and bilirubin (ctBl) levels were measured.ResultsThe mean umbilical cord blood lactate level determined by the gas analyzer was 5.85 ± 2.66 mmol/L (ranging from 1.4 mmol/L to 13.4 mmol/L). Lactate level estimated by Lactate Scout was 5.66 ± 2.65 mmol/L and did not significantly differ from the reference method level (P = 0.2547). The mean lactate level determined by StatStrip Lactate was significantly lower than by the gas analyzer – 4.81 ± 2.38 mmol/L (P 2and pCO2, ctHb and ctBl levels did not affect the accuracy of the lactate measurement in absolute units (mmol/L).ConclusionUmbilical cord blood lactate level measured by StatStrip Lactate was lower than estimated by the ABL800 FLEX gas analyzer. This shows the necessity to develop decision-making reference points separately for each device. Umbilical cord blood pH, BE, pO2and pCO2, ctHb and ctBl levels did not affect the accuracy of measurements by electrochemical portable devices.

Details

ISSN :
16193997
Volume :
48
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of perinatal medicineReferences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....116d0448dca7445ef1afec87cef3ab73