Back to Search Start Over

Environmental assessment of trout farming in France by life cycle assessment: using bootstrapped principal component analysis to better define system classification

Authors :
Xiaobo Chen
Aurélien Tocqueville
Joël Aubin
Elisabeth Samson
Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation (SAS)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST
UMR 1302 Structures et Marchés Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST-Structures et Marchés Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires (SMART)
Institut Technique de l'Aviculture et des Elevages de Petits Animaux (ITAVI)
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Structures et Marchés Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires (SMART)
ITAVI
Source :
Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, 2015, 87, pp.87-95. ⟨10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.021⟩, Journal of Cleaner Production (87), 87–95. (2015)
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

Trout farming is the main fish production system in France. This article describes a system to classify trout farms based on environmental impacts calculated by life cycle assessment and technical and economic indicators. Since the number of surveyed farms was too small for a robust assessment, we combined principal component analysis (PCA) with a non-parametric bootstrap technique. French trout farms were surveyed to collect technical and economic indicators. The representativeness of the survey was verified by comparing it to a national inventory. Life cycle assessment was used to estimate environmental impacts of farms and the contribution of each production stage to impacts. PCA was used to evaluate both technical-economic and environmental indicators of the trout farms, which were separated into three groups based on the size of fish produced (pan-size, large and mixed-size, and very large). Non-parametric bootstrap was used to compare the groups and to test the significance of PCA results. Results validated the fish-farm classification system based on the size of fish produced and indicated that farm operations and fish feeding contributed the most to environmental impacts. The PCA method distinguished three groups via their technical indicators, with non-significant differences among the groups in environmental impacts. However, environmental indicators showed strong links with technical and economic indicators. In conclusion, bootstrapped PCA offers the ability to assess groups of trout production system when the sample size is too small and provides more conservative results by considering uncertainty. Future studies should focus on providing reliable data to reduce uncertainty.[br/]

Details

ISSN :
09596526
Volume :
87
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Cleaner Production
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....114a7ec8f43f5718560cd0fe92778ba7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.021