Back to Search
Start Over
Moxifloxacin versus Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone in the management of odontogenic maxillofacial infectious processes: a preliminary, intrahospital, controlled clinical trial
- Source :
- Gómez Arámbula, Hansel ; Hidalgo Hurtado, Antonio ; Rodríguez Flores, Rosaura ; González Amaro, Ana María ; Garrocho Rangel, Arturo ; Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús. Moxifloxacin versus Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone in the management of odontogenic maxillofacial infectious processes: a preliminary, intrahospital, controlled clinical trial. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2015, Vol. 7, No. 5: 634-639, RODERIC. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat de Valéncia, instname, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to compare the days of hospitalization length between patients treated with Moxifloxacin with that of patients treated with a Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone combination and additionally, to isolate and identify the oral pathogens involved in orofacial odontogenic infections. Material and Methods: A pilot-controlled-clinical-trial was carried out on hospitalized patients with cervicofacial odontogenic abscesses or cellulitis, who were randomly asigned to two study groups: 1) patients who received Moxifloxacin, and 2) patients receiving Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone combination. Infiltrate samples were collected through transdermic or transmucosal punction and later cultured on a media specific for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Mean hospitalization duration in days until hospital discharge and susceptibility assessment in rates were established. Results: Mean hospitalization time in days of patients treated with Moxifloxacin was 7.0 ± 1.6 days, while in the Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone group, this was 8.4 ± 1.8 days, although significant difference could not be demonstrated ( p =0.074). A total of 43 strains were isolated, all of these Gram-positive. These strains appeared to be highly sen - sitive to Moxifloxacin (97.5%) and Ceftriaxone (92.5%). Conclusions: Moxifloxacin and Ceftriaxone appear to be potential convenient and rational alternatives to traditional antibiotics, for treating severe odontogenic infections, in conjunction with surgical extraoral incision, debridement, and drainage.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Debridement
business.industry
medicine.drug_class
Research
medicine.medical_treatment
Antibiotics
Clindamycin
Odontología
medicine.disease
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]
Ciencias de la salud
Clinical trial
Antibiotic resistance
Moxifloxacin
Internal medicine
Cellulitis
UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS
medicine
Ceftriaxone
Oral Surgery
business
General Dentistry
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Gómez Arámbula, Hansel ; Hidalgo Hurtado, Antonio ; Rodríguez Flores, Rosaura ; González Amaro, Ana María ; Garrocho Rangel, Arturo ; Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús. Moxifloxacin versus Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone in the management of odontogenic maxillofacial infectious processes: a preliminary, intrahospital, controlled clinical trial. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2015, Vol. 7, No. 5: 634-639, RODERIC. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat de Valéncia, instname, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....111d7a15f92bb4485b0a335ba72e3bbe