Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Different Dosing Protocols of Anti-Snake Venom (ASV) in Snake Bite Cases

Authors :
D B Kadam
Vishwajeet S. Ghorpade
Bharti R. Daswani
H C Manu
Balasaheb B. Ghongane
A S Chandanwale
Source :
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol 11, Iss 9, Pp FC17-FC21 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
JCDR Research and Publications, 2017.

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the cost of Anti-Snake Venom (ASV) and irregularity in its supply, there is often a need to curtail doses of ASV, despite guidelines for management of snake bite. During June 2013 to September 2013, when ASV was in short supply, our institutional committee reviewed the overall hospital statistics of snake bite cases as well as scientific literature and formulated a working modified protocol that used low dose of ASV in snake bite cases. Aim: To retrospectively analyse and compare the modified ASV protocol versus conventional ASV protocol with respect to outcome, number of ASV vials required, duration of stay in the hospital/ ICU, and additional supportive interventions needed. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital, Maharashtra, India. Hospital records of inpatients admitted for snake bite during June 2013 to September 2013 (since introduction of the modified protocol) as well as during June 2012 to September 2012, (when patients received conventional protocol-historical controls) were retrospectively analysed to assess the number of ASV vials received by the patients during the stay, need for supportive therapy, duration of stay and outcome of the patients. Results: There was a significant reduction in average number of ASV vials per patient, required vide the modified protocol compared to their historical controls (10.74±0.95 vs 28.17±2.75 p

Details

ISSN :
2249782X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....10e6e3ea95891dbeadccfb692c1c38be
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/20132.10670