Back to Search
Start Over
Does the method of radiologic surveillance affect survival after resection of stage I non–small cell lung cancer?
- Source :
- The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 149:45-53.e3
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2015.
-
Abstract
- Objectives Controversy persists regarding appropriate radiographic surveillance strategies after lung cancer resection. We compared the impact of surveillance computed tomography scan versus chest radiography in patients who underwent resection for stage I lung cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing resection for pathologic stage I lung cancer from January 2000 to April 2013. After resection, follow-up included routine history and physical examination in conjunction with chest radiography or computed tomography at the discretion of the treating physician. Identification of successive lung malignancy (ie, recurrence at any new site or new primary) and survival were recorded. Results There were 554 evaluable patients, with 232 receiving routine postoperative computed tomography and 322 receiving routine chest radiography. Postoperative 5-year survival was 67.8% in the computed tomography group versus 74.8% in the chest radiography group ( P = .603). Successive lung malignancy was found in 27% (63/232) of patients receiving computed tomography versus 22% (72/322) receiving chest radiography ( P = .19). The mean time from surgery to diagnosis of successive malignancy was 1.93 years for computed tomography versus 2.56 years for chest radiography ( P = .046). For the computed tomography group, 41% (26/63) of successive malignancies were treated with curative intent versus 40% (29/72) in the chest radiography group ( P = .639). Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated imaging modality (computed tomography vs chest radiography) was not associated with survival ( P = .958). Conclusions Surveillance computed tomography may result in earlier diagnosis of successive malignancy versus chest radiography in stage I lung cancer, although no difference in survival was demonstrated. A randomized trial would help determine the impact of postoperative surveillance strategies on survival.
- Subjects :
- Male
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
medicine.medical_specialty
Lung Neoplasms
Time Factors
Radiography
medicine.medical_treatment
Physical examination
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Malignancy
Disease-Free Survival
Pneumonectomy
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Factors
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
medicine
Humans
Propensity Score
Lung cancer
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Chi-Square Distribution
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Neoplasms, Second Primary
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Treatment Outcome
Positron emission tomography
Predictive value of tests
Multivariate Analysis
Female
Radiography, Thoracic
Surgery
National Lung Screening Trial
Radiology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00225223
- Volume :
- 149
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....109be35fd8dbc4da840a4991f47bb366
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.095