Back to Search Start Over

Current state of the global operational aerosol multi‐model ensemble: An update from the International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP)

Authors :
Thomas F. Eck
Peng Xian
Edward J. Hyer
Jianglong Zhang
Taichu Y. Tanaka
Rostislav Kouznetsov
Angela Benedetti
Nicole Asencio
Keiya Yumimoto
Melanie Ades
Oriol Jorba
Partha S. Bhattacharjee
Zak Kipling
Jeffrey S. Reid
M. E. Brooks
Jun Wang
Mikhail Sofiev
Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Jonathan Guth
Arlindo da Silva
Peter R. Colarco
Yaswant Pradhan
Douglas L. Westphal
Juli I. Rubin
Sara Basart
Charles R. Sampson
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Earth Sciences Department [Barcelona]
Barcelona Supercomputing Center - Centro Nacional de Supercomputacion (BSC - CNS)
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Branch [ Greenbelt]
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)
Meteorological Research Institute [Tsukuba] (MRI)
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)
King Abdulaziz University
Groupe d'étude de l'atmosphère météorologique (CNRM-GAME)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2019, 145 (S1), pp.176-209. ⟨10.1002/qj.3497⟩, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Royal Meteorological Society (Great Britain), Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Wiley, 2019, 145 (S1), pp.176-209. ⟨10.1002/qj.3497⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

Since the first International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP) multi‐model ensemble (MME) study, the number of ICAP global operational aerosol models has increased from five to nine. An update of the current ICAP status is provided, along with an evaluation of the performance of ICAP‐MME over 2012–2017, with a focus on June 2016–May 2017. Evaluated with ground‐based Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) aerosol optical depth (AOD) and data assimilation quality MODerate‐resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) retrieval products, the ICAP‐MME AOD consensus remains the overall top‐scoring and most consistent performer among all models in terms of root‐mean‐square error (RMSE), bias and correlation for total, fine‐ and coarse‐mode AODs as well as dust AOD; this is similar to the first ICAP‐MME study. Further, over the years, the performance of ICAP‐MME is relatively stable and reliable compared to more variability in the individual models. The extent to which the AOD forecast error of ICAP‐MME can be predicted is also examined. Leading predictors are found to be the consensus mean and spread. Regression models of absolute forecast errors were built for AOD forecasts of different lengths for potential applications. ICAP‐MME performance in terms of modal AOD RMSEs of the 21 regionally representative sites over 2012–2017 suggests a general tendency for model improvements in fine‐mode AOD, especially over Asia. No significant improvement in coarse‐mode AOD is found overall for this time period.<br />International Cooperative for Aerosol Predictions (ICAP) model 550 nm total AOD RMSE of the 72 h forecast versus corresponding mean AODs for AERONET sites listed in Table 2. Large black dots are ICAP multi‐model ensemble consensus means. Individual models are in small coloured dots. Validation of fine‐ and coarse‐modal AODs and dust AOD is also available in Figure 2.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00359009 and 1477870X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2019, 145 (S1), pp.176-209. ⟨10.1002/qj.3497⟩, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Royal Meteorological Society (Great Britain), Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Wiley, 2019, 145 (S1), pp.176-209. ⟨10.1002/qj.3497⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....106106e8005344314cb2e6e788cc4faf
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3497⟩