Back to Search Start Over

Profiles of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis Activation-Associated Molecular Markers of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in the Acute Phase

Authors :
Yuka Sugawara
Atsushi Yasumoto
Satoko Sakurai
Yutaka Yatomi
Madoka Fujisawa
Yoshihiro Fujimura
Hideki Kato
Masanori Matsumoto
Yoko Yoshida
Masaomi Nangaku
Source :
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Japan Atherosclerosis Society, 2020.

Abstract

Aim Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), characterized by thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), is a genetic, life-threatening disease which needs many differential diagnoses. This study aimed to reveal coagulation and fibrinolysis profiles in aHUS and secondary TMA patients. Furthermore, we investigated whether aHUS patients progress to, and meet, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) criteria. Methods The acute phase samples were available in 15 aHUS and 20 secondary TMA patients. We measured PT-ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen, fibrin degradation product (FDP), fibrin monomer complex (FMC), antithrombin (AT), plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), and von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag). We examined and compared these tests among aHUS, secondary TMA patients, and healthy volunteer (HV), and evaluated whether patients with aHUS and secondary TMA met DIC criteria. Results PT-ratio, APTT, FDP, FMC and PIC in patients with aHUS and secondary TMA were higher than those in HV. Fibrinogen and AT showed no significant difference among three groups. VWF:Ag was higher in only aHUS patients. No tests showed significant difference between aHUS and secondary TMA patients. Three aHUS patients out of 15 met DIC criteria. Conclusion We revealed the profiles and distributions of coagulation and fibrinolysis tests of aHUS and secondary TMA patients. All tests were enhanced compared to HV; however, our results showed the no specificities in distinguishing aHUS from secondary TMA patients. We also clarified that some aHUS patients fulfilled DIC diagnostic criteria, indicating that DIC itself cannot be an exclusion criterion of aHUS.

Details

ISSN :
18803873 and 13403478
Volume :
27
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....1046732db0bc84273ec9657cefa8ed6a