Back to Search Start Over

Resection of vestibular schwannomas after stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review

Authors :
Sameer Alvi
R. Mark Wiet
Madeline J. Epsten
Bledi C Brahimaj
Richard W. Byrne
Fred Crawford
André Beer-Furlan
Max Whitmeyer
Source :
Journal of Neurosurgery. 135:881-889
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), 2021.

Abstract

Objective Multiple short series have evaluated the efficacy of salvage microsurgery (MS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs); however, there is a lack of a large volume of patient data available for interpretation and clinical adaptation. The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of tumor characteristics, management, and surgical outcomes of salvage of MS after SRS for VS. Methods The Medline/PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were queried according to PRISMA guidelines. All English-language and translated publications were included. Studies lacking adequate study characteristics and outcomes were excluded. Cases involving neurofibromatosis type 2, previous MS, or malignant transformation were excluded when possible. Results Twenty studies containing 297 cases met inclusion criteria. Three additional cases from Rush University Medical Center were added for 300 total cases. Tumor growth with or without symptoms was the primary indication for salvage surgery (92.3% of cases), followed by worsening of symptoms without growth (4.6%) and cystic enlargement (3.1%). The average time to MS after SRS was 39.4 months. The average size and volume of tumor at surgery were 2.44 cm and 5.92 cm3, respectively. The surgical approach was retrosigmoid (42.8%) and translabyrinthine (57.2%); 59.5% of patients had a House-Brackmann (HB) grade of I or II. The facial nerve was preserved in 91.5% of cases. Facial nerve preservation and HB grades were lower for the translabyrinthine versus retrosigmoid approach (p = 0.31 and p = 0.18, respectively); however, fewer complications were noted in the translabyrinthine approach (p = 0.29). Gross-total resection (GTR) was completed in 55.7% of surgeries. Studies that predominantly used subtotal resection (STR) were associated with a lower rate of facial nerve injury (5.3% vs 11.3%, p = 0.07) and higher rate of HB grade I or II (72.9% vs 48.0%, p = 0.00003) versus those using predominantly GTR. However, majority STR was associated with a recurrence rate of 3.6% as compared to 1.4% for majority GTR (p = 0.29). Conclusions This study showed that the leading cause of MS after SRS was tumor growth at an average of 39.4 months after radiation. There were no significant differences in outcomes of facial nerve preservation, postoperative HB grade, or complication rate based on surgical approach. Patients who underwent STR showed statistically significant better HB outcomes compared with GTR. MS after SRS was considered by most authors to be more difficult than primary MS. These data support the notion that the surgical goals of salvage surgery are debulking of tumor mass, decreasing compression of the brainstem, and not necessarily pursuing GTR. Abbreviations CK = CyberKnife; fSRT = fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy; GKS = Gamma Knife surgery; GTR = gross-total resection; HB = House-Brackmann; LINAC = linear accelerator; MS = microsurgery; NF2 = neurofibromatosis type 2; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; STR = subtotal resection; VS = vestibular schwannoma.

Details

ISSN :
19330693 and 00223085
Volume :
135
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Neurosurgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....102f7bfd1052458ec721de3b75574f6c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.7.jns2044