Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of Signal Saturation on QUS Parameter Estimates Based on High-Frequency-Ultrasound Signals Acquired From Isolated Cancerous Lymph Nodes
- Source :
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2017, 64 (10), pp.1501-1513. ⟨10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2737360⟩, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2017, 64 (10), pp.1501-1513. ⟨10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2737360⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017.
-
Abstract
- Choosing an appropriate dynamic range (DR) for acquiring radio frequency (RF) data from a high-frequency-ultrasound (HFU) system is challenging because signals can vary greatly in amplitude as a result of focusing and attenuation effects. In addition, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) results are altered by saturated data. In this paper, the effects of saturation on QUS estimates of effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC) were quantified using simulated and experimental RF data. Experimental data were acquired from 69 dissected human lymph nodes using a single-element transducer with a 26-MHz center frequency. Artificially saturated signals ( $x_{c})$ were produced by thresholding the original unsaturated RF echo signals. Saturation severity was expressed using a quantity called saturate-signal-to-noise ratio (SSNR). Results indicated that saturation has little effect on ESD estimates. However, EAC estimates decreased significantly with decreasing SSNR. An EAC correction algorithm exploiting a linear relationship between EAC values over a range of SSNR values and ${l}^{1}$ -norm of $x_{c}$ (i.e., the sum of absolute values of the true RF echo signal) is developed. The maximal errors in EAC estimates resulting from saturation were −8.05, −3.59, and −0.93 dB/mm3 with the RF echo signals thresholded to keep 5, 6, and 7-bit from the original 8-bit DR, respectively. The EAC correction algorithm reduced maximal errors to −3.71, −0.89, and −0.26 dB/mm3 when signals were thresholded at 5, 6, and 7-bit, respectively.
- Subjects :
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics
[SDV.IB.IMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Imaging
Acoustics
[INFO.INFO-IM] Computer Science [cs]/Medical Imaging
01 natural sciences
Article
0103 physical sciences
[INFO.INFO-IM]Computer Science [cs]/Medical Imaging
Electronic engineering
Humans
Computer Simulation
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Center frequency
010301 acoustics
Instrumentation
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Ultrasonography
010302 applied physics
Physics
Signal processing
Phantoms, Imaging
Dynamic range
Attenuation
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Thresholding
[INFO.INFO-SD] Computer Science [cs]/Sound [cs.SD]
[SDV.IB.IMA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Imaging
Amplitude
Lymphatic Metastasis
[INFO.INFO-SD]Computer Science [cs]/Sound [cs.SD]
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes
Radio frequency
Saturation (chemistry)
Algorithms
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15258955 and 08853010
- Volume :
- 64
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....100588f9600ca5a9d51a522bd644bccb
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2017.2737360