Back to Search
Start Over
Measurement Properties of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Pain-related Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review
- Source :
- The Clinical journal of pain. 37(6)
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to systematically locate, critically appraise, and summarize clinical measurement research addressing the use of Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in pain-related musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched 4 databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and SCOPUS) and screened articles to identify those reporting the psychometric properties (eg, validity, reliability) and interpretability (eg, minimal clinically important difference) of BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 as evaluated in pain-related MSK conditions. Independently, 2 reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of evidence with a structured quality appraisal tool and the updated COSMIN guidelines. RESULTS In all, 26 articles were included (BPI-SF, n=17; SF-MPQ-2, n=9). Both tools lack reporting on their cross-cultural validities and measurement error indices (eg, standard error of measurement). High-quality studies suggest the tools are internally consistent (α=0.83 to 0.96), and they associate modestly with similar outcomes (r=0.3 to 0.69). Strong evidence suggests the BPI-SF conforms to its 2-dimensional structure in MSK studies; the SF-MPQ-2 4-factor structure was not clearly established. Seven reports of high-to-moderate quality evidence were supportive of the BPI-SF known-group validity (n=2) and responsiveness (n=5). One report of high quality established the SF-MPQ-2 responsiveness. DISCUSSION Evidence of high-to-moderate quality supports the internal consistency, criterion-convergent validity, structural validity, and responsiveness of the BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 and establishes their use as generic multidimensional pain outcomes in MSK populations. However, more studies of high quality are still needed on their retest reliability, known-group validity, cross-cultural validity, interpretability properties, and measurement error indices in different MSK populations.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Psychometrics
MEDLINE
Pain
CINAHL
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
030202 anesthesiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Medicine
Humans
Reliability (statistics)
Interpretability
Pain Measurement
business.industry
Minimal clinically important difference
Reproducibility of Results
humanities
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Standard error
McGill Pain Questionnaire
Physical therapy
Neurology (clinical)
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15365409
- Volume :
- 37
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Clinical journal of pain
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0fdd041ceb071bc4420eb6fb68d7c687