Low effective mechanical advantage of giraffes’ limbs during walking reveals trade-off between limb length and locomotor performance

Giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) possess specialised locomotor morphology, namely elongate and gracile distal limbs. Whilst this contributes to their overall height (and enhanced feeding behaviour), we propose that the combination of long limb segments and modest muscle lever arms results in low effective mechanical advantage (EMA, the ratio of in-lever to out-lever moment arms), when compared with other cursorial mammals. To test this, we used a combination of experimentally measured kinematics and ground rection forces (GRFs), musculoskeletal modelling, and inverse dynamics to calculate giraffe forelimb EMA during walking. Giraffes walk with an EMA of 0.34 (±0.05 S.D.), with no evident association with speed within their walking gait. Giraffe EMA was markedly below the expectations extrapolated from other mammals ranging from 0.03 – 297 kg, and provides further evidence that EMA plateaus or even diminishes in mammals exceeding horse size. We further tested the idea that limb segment length is a factor which determines EMA, by modelling the GRF and muscle moment arms in the extinct giraffid Sivatherium giganteum and the other extant giraffid Okapia johnstoni. Giraffa and Okapia shared similar EMA, despite a 4-6 fold difference in body mass (Okapia EMA = 0.38). In contrast Sivatherium, sharing a similar body mass to Giraffa, had greater EMA (0.59), which we propose reflects behavioural differences, such athletic performance. Our modelling approach suggests that limb length is a determinant of GRF moment arm magnitude, and that unless muscle moment arms scale isometrically with limb length, tall mammals are prone to low EMA.Significance StatementGiraffes are the tallest living animals - using their height to access food unavailable to their competitors. It is not clear how their specialized anatomy impacts their athletic ability. We made musculoskeletal models of the forelimbs from a giraffe and two close relatives, and used motion-capture and forceplate data to measure how efficient they are when walking in a straight line. A horse for example, uses just 1 unit of muscle force to oppose 1 unit of force on the ground. Giraffe limbs however are comparatively disadvantaged – their muscles must develop 3 units of force to oppose 1 unit of force at the ground. This explains why giraffes walk and run at relatively slow speeds.