Back to Search Start Over

Clonal relationships of adjacent Gleason pattern 3 and Gleason pattern 5 lesions in Gleason Scores 3+5=8 and 5+3=8

Authors :
Hasim Bakbak
Erolcan Sayar
Harsimar B. Kaur
Daniela C. Salles
Radhika A. Patel
Jessica Hicks
Tamara L. Lotan
Angelo M. De Marzo
Roman Gulati
Jonathan I. Epstein
Michael C. Haffner
Source :
Human Pathology. 130:18-24
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Genomic studies have demonstrated a high level of intra-tumoral heterogeneity in prostate cancer. There is strong evidence suggesting that individual tumor foci can arise as genetically distinct, clonally independent lesions. However, recent studies have also demonstrated that adjacent Gleason pattern (GP) 3 and GP4 lesions can originate from the same clone but follow divergent genetic and morphologic evolution. The clonal relationship of adjacent GP3 and GP5 lesions has thus far not been investigated. Here we analyzed a cohort of 14 cases-11 biopsy and 3 radical prostatectomy specimens-with a Gleason score of 3 + 5 = 8 or 5 + 3 = 8 present in the same biopsy or in a single dominant tumor nodule at radical prostatectomy. Clonal and subclonal relationships between GP3 and GP5 lesions were assessed using genetically validated immunohistochemical assays for ERG, PTEN, and P53. 9/14 (64%) cases showed ERG reactivity in both GP3 and GP5 lesions. Only 1/14 (7%) cases showed a discordant pattern with ERG staining present only in GP3. PTEN expression was lost in 2/14 (14%) cases with perfect concordance between GP5 and GP3. P53 nuclear reactivity was present in 1/14 (7%) case in both GP5 and GP3. This study provides first evidence that the majority of adjacent GP3 and GP5 lesions share driver alterations and are clonally related. In addition, we observed a lower-than-expected rate of PTEN loss in GP5 in the context of Gleason score 3 + 5 = 8 or 5 + 3 = 8 tumors.

Details

ISSN :
00468177
Volume :
130
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Human Pathology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0f30c2f8a3cb92ec86dede4feff29b4a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2022.10.010