Back to Search Start Over

SUPPORT-AF II: Supporting Use of Anticoagulants Through Provider Profiling of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation

Authors :
Rasha Elhag
Jomol Mathew
Bevin Kathleen Shagoury
Abraham Lin
Renato D. Lopes
Michael A. Fischer
Donna Bartlett
Jane S. Saczynski
Ahmed Nagy
Azraa Amroze
Jacqueline Der
Saud Javed
Sybil L. Crawford
Dinesh Yogaratnam
Kathleen M. Mazor
Fatima Vakil
David D. McManus
Jeffrey M. Ashburner
Siddhartha Narayanan
Alok Kapoor
Eric J. Alper
Source :
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 13
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2020.

Abstract

Background: Previous provider-directed electronic messaging interventions have not by themselves improved anticoagulation use in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct engagement with providers using academic detailing coupled with electronic messaging may overcome the limitations of the prior interventions. Methods and Results: We randomized outpatient providers affiliated with our health system in a 2.5:1 ratio to our electronic profiling/messaging combined with academic detailing intervention. In the intervention, we emailed providers monthly reports of their anticoagulation percentage relative to peers for atrial fibrillation patients with elevated stroke risk (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2). We also sent electronic medical record-based messages shortly before an appointment with an anticoagulation-eligible but untreated atrial fibrillation patient. Providers had the option to send responses with explanations for prescribing decisions. We also offered to meet with intervention providers using an academic detailing approach developed based on knowledge gaps discussed in provider focus groups. To assess feasibility, we tracked provider review of our messages. To assess effectiveness, we measured the change in anticoagulation for patients of intervention providers relative to controls. We identified 85 intervention and 34 control providers taking care of 3591 and 1908 patients, respectively; 33 intervention providers participated in academic detailing. More than 80% of intervention providers read our emails, and 98% of the time a provider reviewed our in-basket messages. Replies to messages identified patient refusal as the most common reason for patients not being on anticoagulation (11.2%). For the group of patients not on anticoagulation at baseline assigned to an intervention versus control provider, the adjusted percent increase in the use of anticoagulation over 6 months was 5.2% versus 7.4%, respectively ( P =0.21). Conclusions: Our electronic messaging and academic detailing intervention was feasible but did not increase anticoagulation use. Patient-directed interventions or provider interventions targeting patients declining anticoagulation may be necessary to raise the rate of anticoagulation. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03583008.

Details

ISSN :
19417705 and 19417713
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0f07918a844d37eaa123561e72f6546d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.119.005871