Back to Search
Start Over
The nature of the eurocrisis: a reply to Febrero, Uxó and Bermejo
- Source :
- Review of Keynesian Economics. 6:240-251
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Febrero et al. (2018) criticise the balance-of-payments (BoP) view of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) crisis. I have no major objections to most of the single aspects of the crisis pointed out by these authors, except that they appear to underline specific sides of the EMU crisis, while missing a unifying and realistic explanation. Specific semi-automatic mechanisms differentiate a BoP crisis in a currency union from a traditional one. Unfortunately, these mechanisms give Febrero et al. the illusion that a BoP crisis in a currency union is impossible. My conclusion is that an interpretation of the eurozone's troubles as a BoP crisis provides a more consistent framework. The debate has some relevance for the policy prescriptions to solve the eurocrisis. Given the costs that all sides would incur if the currency union were to break up, austerity policies are still seen by European politicians as a tolerable price to pay to keep foreign imbalances at bay – with the sweetener of some European Central Bank (ECB) support, for as long as Berlin allows the ECB to provide it.
- Subjects :
- Economics and Econometrics
Interpretation (philosophy)
Keynesian economics
European central bank
International economics
Post-Keynesian economics
European economic and monetary union
Currency union
Austerity
TARGET2
balance-of-payments crisis
euro
Economic and monetary union
Economics
Relevance (law)
European economic and monetary union, ECB, balance-of-payments crisis, TARGET2, euro
ECB
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 20495331 and 20495323
- Volume :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Review of Keynesian Economics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0ef3d855f732025047b2cf040f99f045
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2018.02.05