Back to Search Start Over

Disease tracking markers for Alzheimer's disease at the prodromal (MCI) stage

Authors :
Drago, Valeria
Babiloni, Claudio
Bartrés-Faz, David
Caroli, Anna
Bosch, Beatriz
Hensch, Tilman
Didic, Mira
Klafki, Hans-Wolfgang
Pievani, Michela
Jovicich, Jorge
Venturi, Luca
Spitzer, Philipp
Vecchio, Fabrizio
Schoenknecht, Peter
Wiltfang, Jans
Redolfi, Alberto
Forloni, Gianluigi
Blin, Olivier
Irving, Elaine
Davis, Ceri
Hrdemark, Hans-Goran
Frisoni, Giovanni B.
Hårdemark, Hans-goran
Source :
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 26
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Older persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) feature neurobiological Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in 50% to 70% of the cases and develop dementia within the next 5 to 7 years. Current evidence suggests that biochemical, neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and neuropsychological markers can track the disease over time since the MCI stage (also called prodromal AD). The amount of evidence supporting their validity is of variable strength. We have reviewed the current literature and categorized evidence of validity into three classes: Class A, availability of multiple serial studies; Class B a single serial study or multiple cross sectional studies of patients with increasing disease severity from MCI to probable AD; and class C, multiple cross sectional studies of patients in the dementia stage, not including the MCI stage. Several Class A studies suggest that episodic memory and semantic fluency are the most reliable neuropsychological markers of progression. Hippocampal atrophy, ventricular volume and whole brain atrophy are structural MRI markers with class A evidence. Resting-state fMRI and connectivity, and diffusion MR markers in the medial temporal white matter (parahippocampus and posterior cingulum) and hippocampus are promising but require further validation. Change in amyloid load in MCI patients warrant further investigations, e.g. over longer period of time, to assess its value as marker of disease progression. Several spectral markers of resting state EEG rhythms that might reflect neurodegenerative processes in the prodromal stage of AD (EEG power density, functional coupling, spectral coherence, and synchronization) suffer from lack of appropriately designed studies. Although serial studies on late event-related potentials (ERPs) in healthy elders or MCI patients are inconclusive, others tracking disease progression and effects of cholinesterase inhibiting drugs in AD, and cross-sectional including MCI or predicting development of AD offer preliminary evidence of validity as a marker of disease progression from the MCI stage. CSF Markers, such as Aβ 1-42, t-tau and p-tau are valuable markers which support the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. However, these markers are not sensitive to disease progression and cannot be used to monitor the severity of Alzheimer's disease. For Isoprostane F2 some evidence exists that its increase correlates with the progression and the severity of AD.

Details

ISSN :
18758908
Volume :
26
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0df5fbbbc1f9ced3c97522bd3c27d8d9