Foreign candidates on the transplantation waiting list: an ethical dilemma

T IS NOW well recognized that the gap between the supply of available transplantable human organs and the need is constantly increasing. Medical suitability is the basis of organ allocation, although the social, economic, psychologic, and demographic situation of each potential recipient represents important considerations. The ethical dilemma that we face is whether foreign, nonresident candidates should be placed on a national waiting list, and, if the answer is positive, under what terms? Organ transplantation, especially heart or lung, requires not only a well-trained group, but also an extensive infrastructure, which does not exist in each country. The lack of organs in the one hand and the lack of infrastructure in other countries on the other hand lead to the need for a mutual partnership among nations. Among the 100 organs transplanted in our center, 3 were donated by nonresident Palestinians who were treated in Israeli hospitals, 1 of whom was a victim of a violent act during the “Intifada.” The Palestinian population, although being provided with diverse medical services, is not entitled to be on the Israeli national waiting list. The ethical question that the medical community faces in these circumstances is whether to accept a family request to donate the organs to a close relative of the donor instead of offering them to all patients on the list. The other debate is whether the waiting list should be equally open to residents and nonresidents, now that they have became part of the potential population to donate.