Back to Search Start Over

Effects of model incompleteness on the drift-scan calibration of radio telescopes

Authors :
Phil Bull
David DeBoer
Adam P. Beardsley
Nipanjana Patra
Ziyaad Halday
Nima Razavi-Ghods
Nicholas S. Kern
Aaron R. Parsons
Piyanat Kittiwisit
Kingsley Gale-Sides
Robert Pascua
Max Tegmark
Judd D. Bowman
Adam Lanman
Samantha Pieterse
James Robnett
Peter Sims
Gianni Bernardi
Peter K. G. Williams
Miguel F. Morales
Chris Carilli
Saul A. Kohn
Zara Abdurashidova
Eloy de Lera Acedo
Zaki S. Ali
Steven R. Furlanetto
Abraham R. Neben
Eunice Matsetela
Randall Fritz
Bojan Nikolic
Aaron Ewall-Wice
Bryna J. Hazelton
Deepthi Gorthi
Richard F. Bradley
Matthew Kolopanis
Jon Ringuette
Brian Glendenning
Matt Dexter
Joshua S. Dillon
Carina Cheng
Paul La Plante
Austin Julius
S. H. Carey
Nithyanandan Thyagarajan
Haoxuan Zheng
David B. Lewis
Mario G. Santos
Daniel C. Jacobs
Joshua Kerrigan
Steven G. Murray
Cresshim Malgas
Jack Hickish
Adrian Liu
James E. Aguirre
Nicolas Fagnoni
Jacob Burba
Yanga Balfour
Lourence Malan
Craig Smith
Raul A. Monsalve
Bradley Greig
Jonathan C. Pober
Andrei Mesinger
Jasper Grobbelaar
Tashalee S. Billings
Zachary E. Martinot
Telalo Lekalake
Matthys Maree
B. K. Gehlot
David MacMahon
Yin-Zhe Ma
Mathakane Molewa
Paul Alexander
Kathryn Rosie
Tshegofalang Mosiane
Nivedita Mahesh
John Ely
Jacqueline N. Hewitt
Angelo Syce
Gehlot, B. K.
Jacobs, D. C.
Bowman, J. D.
Mahesh, N.
Murray, S. G.
Kolopanis, M.
Beardsley, A. P.
Abdurashidova, Z.
Aguirre, J. E.
Alexander, P.
Ali, Z. S.
Balfour, Y.
Bernardi, G.
Billings, T. S.
Bradley, R. F.
Bull, P.
Burba, J.
Carey, S.
Carilli, C. L.
Cheng, C.
Deboer, D. R.
Dexter, M.
De Lera Acedo, E.
Dillon, J. S.
Ely, J.
Ewall-Wice, A.
Fagnoni, N.
Fritz, R.
Furlanetto, S. R.
Gale-Sides, K.
Glendenning, B.
Gorthi, D.
Greig, B.
Grobbelaar, J.
Halday, Z.
Hazelton, B. J.
Hewitt, J. N.
Hickish, J.
Julius, A.
Kern, N. S.
Kerrigan, J.
Kittiwisit, P.
Kohn, S. A.
Lanman, A.
La Plante, P.
Lekalake, T.
Lewis, D.
Liu, A.
Ma, Y. -Z.
Macmahon, D.
Malan, L.
Malgas, C.
Maree, M.
Martinot, Z. E.
Matsetela, E.
Mesinger, A.
Molewa, M.
Monsalve, R. A.
Morales, M. F.
Mosiane, T.
Neben, A. R.
Nikolic, B.
Parsons, A. R.
Pascua, R.
Patra, N.
Pieterse, S.
Pober, J. C.
Razavi-Ghods, N.
Ringuette, J.
Robnett, J.
Rosie, K.
Santos, M. G.
Sims, P.
Smith, C.
Syce, A.
Tegmark, M.
Thyagarajan, N.
Williams, P. K. G.
Zheng, H.
ITA
USA
Source :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 506:4578-4592
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021.

Abstract

Precision calibration poses challenges to experiments probing the redshifted 21-cm signal of neutral hydrogen from the Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionization (z~30-6). In both interferometric and global signal experiments, systematic calibration is the leading source of error. Though many aspects of calibration have been studied, the overlap between the two types of instruments has received less attention. We investigate the sky based calibration of total power measurements with a HERA dish and an EDGES style antenna to understand the role of auto-correlations in the calibration of an interferometer and the role of sky in calibrating a total power instrument. Using simulations we study various scenarios such as time variable gain, incomplete sky calibration model, and primary beam model. We find that temporal gain drifts, sky model incompleteness, and beam inaccuracies cause biases in the receiver gain amplitude and the receiver temperature estimates. In some cases, these biases mix spectral structure between beam and sky resulting in spectrally variable gain errors. Applying the calibration method to the HERA and EDGES data, we find good agreement with calibration via the more standard methods. Although instrumental gains are consistent with beam and sky errors similar in scale to those simulated, the receiver temperatures show significant deviations from expected values. While we show that it is possible to partially mitigate biases due to model inaccuracies by incorporating a time-dependent gain model in calibration, the resulting errors on calibration products are larger and more correlated. Completely addressing these biases will require more accurate sky and primary beam models.<br />Comment: 16 pages, 13 figures, 1 table; accepted for publication in MNRAS main journal

Details

ISSN :
13652966 and 00358711
Volume :
506
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0c0deaba63016ed8efc927b8d2bf07d9