Back to Search
Start Over
CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression
- Source :
- JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 13(3), 732-742. Elsevier Inc.
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Elsevier Inc., 2020.
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) alone, adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion assessed by computed tomography (CTP) alone, and coronary CTA + CTP by using a 16-cm Z-axis coverage scanner versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the clinical standard. Background: Diagnostic performance of coronary CTA for in-stent restenosis detection is still challenging. Recently, CTP showed additional diagnostic power over coronary CTA in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. However, few data are available on CTP performance in patients with previous stent implantation. Methods: Consecutive stable patients with previous coronary stenting referred for ICA were enrolled. All patients underwent stress myocardial CTP and rest CTP + coronary CTA. Invasive FFR was performed during ICA when clinically indicated. The diagnostic rate and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA, CTP, and coronary CTA + CTP were evaluated in stent-, territory-, and patient-based analyses. Results: In the 150 enrolled patients (132 men; mean age 65.1 ± 9.1 years), the CTP diagnostic rate was significantly higher than that of coronary CTA in all analyses (territory based [96.7% vs. 91.1%; p < 0.0001] and patient based [96% vs. 68%; p < 0.0001]). When ICA was used as gold standard, CTP diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher than that of coronary CTA in all analyses (territory based [92.1% vs. 85.5%, p < 0.03] and patient based [86.7% vs. 76.7%, p < 0.03]). The concordant coronary CTA + CTP assessment exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy values versus ICA (95.8% in the territory-based analysis). The diagnostic accuracy of CTP was significantly higher than that of coronary CTA (75% vs. 30.5%; p < 0.001). The radiation exposure of coronary CTA + CTP was 4.15 ± 1.5 mSv. Conclusions: In patients with coronary stents, CTP significantly improved the diagnostic rate and accuracy of coronary CTA alone compared with both ICA and invasive FFR as gold standard.
- Subjects :
- Male
Adenosine
Computed Tomography Angiography
Vasodilator Agents
viruses
medicine.medical_treatment
invasive coronary angiography
Perfusion scanning
Coronary Artery Disease
Fractional flow reserve
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Coronary Angiography
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Coronary artery disease
coronary stent
0302 clinical medicine
Restenosis
heterocyclic compounds
Prospective Studies
musculoskeletal, neural, and ocular physiology
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Middle Aged
static CT perfusion
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Treatment Outcome
Disease Progression
Female
Stents
Radiology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Perfusion
medicine.drug
medicine.medical_specialty
coronary CT angiography
Article
Coronary Restenosis
03 medical and health sciences
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Predictive Value of Tests
coronary stents
Multidetector Computed Tomography
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
cardiovascular diseases
Aged
business.industry
Stent
Gold standard (test)
medicine.disease
Iodixanol
enzymes and coenzymes (carbohydrates)
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1936878X
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 13(3), 732-742. Elsevier Inc.
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0bafc9d504d04be50aeb81b4b43b3e49