Back to Search
Start Over
What are cancer patients willing to pay for prophylactic epoetin alfa?
- Source :
- Cancer. 83:2588-2596
- Publication Year :
- 1998
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 1998.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND Anemia, one of the most common complications of cancer chemotherapy, has been managed with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. As an alternative, the agent epoetin alfa has the potential to reduce the transfusion requirements of patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. To estimate the value that cancer patients place on the drug, an economic analysis using the concept of willingness to pay (WTP) was conducted. METHODS The method of WTP was used within the framework of a classical cost-benefit analysis to estimate the net cost or benefit of administering prophylactic epoetin alfa to cancer patients. This estimate included the direct cost of epoetin alfa administration and savings secondary to reduced RBC transfusions. A cohort of 100 cancer patients who received or were scheduled to receive cisplatin or noncisplatin chemotherapy (50 per group) were then interviewed to measure the maximum WTP (net benefit) that they experienced with epoetin alfa. RESULTS Regarding the benefits they would experience after 3 months of epoetin alfa administration, patients receiving cisplatin and noncisplatin therapy stated that they would be willing to pay an average of 587 U.S. dollars (U.S.$587) (95%CI: $300-$875) and U.S.$613 (95%CI: $324-$902), respectively. These benefits were then subtracted from the total cost of the drug when administered to patients receiving cisplatin (U.S.$3530) and noncisplatin (U.S.$3653) therapy. This produced a net incremental treatment cost of U.S.$2943 (95%CI: $2655-$3230) and U.S.$3039 (95%CI: $2750-$3328) for the respective treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study suggest that the routine administration of epoetin alfa to cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy is a highly resource-intensive treatment policy with modest benefit to patients. Additional research is required to identify high risk patient subgroups who would benefit most from the drug. [See editorial on pages 2427-9, this issue.] Cancer 1998;83:2588-2596. © 1998 American Cancer Society.
- Subjects :
- Male
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Anemia
Cost-Benefit Analysis
medicine.medical_treatment
Antineoplastic Agents
Sensitivity and Specificity
Life Expectancy
Willingness to pay
Neoplasms
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Erythropoietin
Health Services Needs and Demand
Chemotherapy
Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy
Cost–benefit analysis
business.industry
Prescription Fees
Epoetin alfa
Cancer
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Recombinant Proteins
Surgery
Epoetin Alfa
Socioeconomic Factors
Oncology
Multivariate Analysis
Cohort
Hematinics
Income
Female
Cisplatin
Erythrocyte Transfusion
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10970142 and 0008543X
- Volume :
- 83
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Cancer
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0b6ccbc13bf18c0893015e511564c12c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981215)83:12<2588::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-m