Back to Search Start Over

On-line haemodiafiltration with and without acetate

Authors :
Giuseppe Ferro
Pietro Dattolo
T. Cerrai
Francesco Pizzarelli
Source :
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 21:1648-1651
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2006.

Abstract

Background. In patients on on-line convective treatments, given the considerable quantity of dialysis fluid re-infused, the small amount of acetate present in bicarbonate dialysis fluid as a pH stabilizing factor may allow a significant transfer of that anion to the patient, possibly inducing cytokine activation. Methods. To verify this hypothesis, we performed on-line haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) with (3 mmol/l) and without acetate in dialysis fluid in a cross-over randomized order on 12 prevalent patients. Results. In comparison with the pre-treatment values, plasma acetate levels were unchanged during and after acetate-free OL-HDF, while they were 5–6 times higher in the course of OL-HDF containing acetate in dialysis fluid; plasma acetate levels returned to basal values 2 h after the end of the procedure. The total increase of bases in the patient attributable to acetate was 36%. Plasma bicarbonate values at the end of treatment were significantly lower in treatments without acetate, as compared to those with acetate. Interleukin-6 plasma levels were super-imposable at the beginning and in the course of the two methods compared, but there was a tendency towards a greater increase at an interval of 2 h following OL-HDF with acetate. Conclusions. Our preliminary results confirm the assumption that body gain of acetate is particularly high in convective treatments, while acetate-free OL-HDF slows down acetate burden. Clinical advantages due to these effects should be evaluated in properly designed prospective studies.

Details

ISSN :
14602385 and 09310509
Volume :
21
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0b3f8e9f7259a73c985b4a57d6a707bf
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfk093