Back to Search
Start Over
A one-year follow-up study of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis : an appraisal of comparative longitudinal sensitivity
- Source :
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Recercat: Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya), Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, BMC Neurology
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Altres ajuts: We also thank Ignasi Gich from Department of Epidemiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau for his advice on statistical analysis. Neuropsychological batteries are infrequently used to assess cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis because they are time-consuming and require trained personnel. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is suggested to be a useful screening tool to measure cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis patients and is more valid and reliable over time than the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate which of these tests was more sensitive to cognitive impairment at one-year follow-up. A total of 237 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and 57 healthy controls underwent a complete neuropsychological assessment. One year later, we assessed 196 patients using the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests. We also administered other executive function and prospective memory tests, together with fatigue and depression questionnaires. A total of 33.8% of patients were classified as cognitively impaired. The SDMT and the PASAT 3 seconds test (PASAT3) had a sensitivity of 0.809 and 0.783, respectively, thereby classifying patients as cognitively impaired. Analysis of 196 patients one year later showed 31.6% had cognitive impairment compared with 27.6% at the first assessment. The sensitivity to detect cognitive impairment after one year was 0.824 for SDMT and 0.796 for PASAT3. When the predictors were removed from the comparative standard battery, SDMT still showed a slightly higher sensitivity. Both SDMT and PASAT3 correlated significantly with all tests, but SDMT showed higher correlation values. Furthermore, SDMT was completed by all subjects while PASAT3 was completed by 86.9% of patients and 94.7% of controls. SDMT is simpler to administer than PASAT3 and may be slightly more sensitive to MS cognitive impairment. It could thus be a suitable test to assess cognitive impairment routinely in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Neurology
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test
Memory, Episodic
Clinical Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests
Audiology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Neuropsychological assessment
Multiple sclerosis
Executive Function
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
Cognition
Executive function
Surveys and Questionnaires
Prospective memory
medicine
Humans
Mass Screening
Attention
Longitudinal Studies
Psychiatry
Speed of information processing
Fatigue
Mass screening
Depression (differential diagnoses)
medicine.diagnostic_test
Depression
business.industry
Neuropsychology
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Case-Control Studies
Female
Neurology (clinical)
Cognition Disorders
business
Follow-Up Studies
Research Article
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Recercat: Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya), Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, BMC Neurology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0a741b76309000a8df6fb1fec58800d7