Back to Search Start Over

A multicentre study of intentional behavioural responses measured using the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised in patients with minimally conscious state

Authors :
Viviana Cardinale
Pasquale Moretta
Giordano Gatta
Joseph T. Giacino
Anna Estraneo
Luigi Trojano
Antonio De Tanti
Estraneo, A
Moretta, P
Cardinale, V
De Tanti, A
Gatta, G
Giacino, Jt
Trojano, Luigi
Source :
Clinical Rehabilitation. 29:803-808
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
SAGE Publications, 2014.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate which conscious behaviour is most frequently detected using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised in patients with minimally conscious state. Design: Multicentre, cross-sectional study. Setting: One intensive care unit, 8 post-acute rehabilitation centres and 2 long-term facilities. Subjects: Fifty-two patients with established diagnosis of minimally conscious state of different aetiology. Main measures: All patients were assessed by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Results: In most patients (34/52) non-reflexive responses were identified by two or more subscales of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, whereas in 14 patients only the visual subscale could identify cortically-mediated behaviours, and in the remaining 4 patients only the motor subscale did so. The clinical signs of intentional behaviour were most often detected by the visual subscale (43/52 patients) and by the motor subscale (31/52), and least frequently by the oromotor/verbal subscale (3/52) of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. This clinical pattern was observed independently from time post-onset and aetiology. Conclusions: Non-reflexive visual behaviour, identified by the visual subscale of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, is the most frequently detected intentional sign consistent with the diagnosis of minimally conscious state, independently from aetiology and time post-onset.

Details

ISSN :
14770873 and 02692155
Volume :
29
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Rehabilitation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....09a9745637ff823701ee54c2d344419b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514556002