Back to Search Start Over

Metronomic capecitabine as second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib discontinuation

Authors :
Raffaella Tortora
Maria Aurelia Barbera
Francesco Giuseppe Foschi
Franco Trevisani
Francesco Tovoli
Andrea Casadei Gardini
Francesca Garuti
Giovan Giuseppe Di Costanzo
Stefania De Lorenzo
Rodolfo Sacco
Giovanni Brandi
Mauro Bernardi
Alessandro Granito
Fabio Marra
Andrea L Inghilesi
Trevisani, Franco
Brandi, Giovanni
Garuti, Francesca
Barbera, Maria Aurelia
Tortora, Raffaella
Casadei Gardini, Andrea
Granito, Alessandro
Tovoli, Francesco
De Lorenzo, Stefania
Inghilesi, Andrea Lorenzo
Foschi, Francesco Giuseppe
Bernardi, Mauro
Marra, Fabio
Sacco, Rodolfo
Di Costanzo, Giovan Giuseppe
F. Trevisani, G. Brandi, F. Garuti, M.A. Barbera, R. Tortora, A. Casadei Gardini, A. Granito, F. Tovoli, S. De Lorenzo, A.L. Inghilesi, F.G. Foschi, M. Bernardi, F. Marra, R. Sacco, G.G. Di Costanzo
Source :
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 144:403-414
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2017.

Abstract

Purpose: Metronomic capecitabine (MC) is a well-tolerated systemic treatment showing promising results in one retrospective study, as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: 117 patients undergoing MC were compared to 112 patients, eligible for this treatment, but undergoing best supportive care (BSC) after sorafenib discontinuation for toxicity or HCC progression. The two groups were compared for demographic and clinical features. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to detect independent prognostic factors. To balance confounding factors between the two groups, a propensity score model based on independent prognosticators (performance status, neoplastic thrombosis, causes of sorafenib discontinuation and pre-sorafenib treatment) was performed. Results: Patients undergoing MC showed better performance status, lower tumor burden, lower prevalence of portal vein thrombosis, and better cancer stage. Median (95% CI) post-sorafenib survival (PSS) was longer in MC than in BSC patients [9.5 (7.5–11.6) vs 5.0 (4.2–5.7)months (p < 0.001)]. Neoplastic thrombosis, cause of sorafenib discontinuation, pre-sorafenib treatment and MC were independent prognosticators. The benefit of capecitabine was confirmed in patients after matching with propensity score [PSS: 9.9 (6.8–12.9) vs. 5.8 (4.8–6.8)months, (p = 0.001)]. MC lowered the mortality risk by about 40%. MC achieved better results in patients who stopped sorafenib for adverse events than in those who progressed during it [PSS: 17.3 (10.5–24.1) vs. 7.8 (5.2–10.1) months, (p = 0.035)]. Treatment toxicity was low and easily manageable with dose modulation. Conclusions: MC may be an efficient and safe second-line systemic therapy for HCC patients who discontinued sorafenib for toxicity or tumor progression.

Details

ISSN :
14321335 and 01715216
Volume :
144
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....09a21f0a364d503e14f9472e2fb8d481
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2556-6