Back to Search Start Over

Real-world effectiveness of Fertistartkit® treatment in women undergoing ART in French clinical practice: a retrospective multicentre study

Authors :
Catherine Rongières
Nadia Kazdar
F. Guerif
Xenia Lechat
Christophe Ozanon
Nicolas Chevalier
Paul Barrière
Sandrine Frantz-Blancpain
Emilie Soriano
Tal Anahory
Ronan Callec
Solène Languille
Nathalie Massin
Pietro Santulli
Monitoring Force Group (Maisons-Laffitte France)
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil (CHIC)
Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique II et Médecine de la Reproduction [Paris]
Université Paris Descartes - Faculté de Médecine (UPD5 Médecine)
Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)
Institut Cochin (IC UM3 (UMR 8104 / U1016))
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)
Clinique Natecia (Lyon)
Laboratoire Eylau-Unilabs [Neuilly-sur-Seine ] (Clinique Pierre-Cherest)
Clinique Pierre Cherest [Neuilly-Sur-Seine]
Polyclinique Jean Villar [Bruges, France]
Laboratoires Genevrier Antibes
Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique [CHU Bordeaux]
CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux]
Clinique du Val d'Ouest
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours)
Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve [CHRU Montpellier]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)
Centre Médico-chirurgical Obstétrique (CMCO )
CHU Strasbourg
Centre AMP St Roch [Montpellier] (PMA - Fécondation in vitro (fiv) ICSI IMSI Fivete IIU - PMA)
Service de Biologie de la Reproduction [CHU Nantes]
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes)
Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie (U1064 Inserm - CRTI)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Nantes - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (UFR MEDECINE)
Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN)
This study was fully financed by Laboratoires Genevrier to support study design, data extraction in the centres, data management, statistical analysis and medical writing by Monitoring Force.
Le Bihan, Sylvie
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU TOURS)
Source :
Reproductive BioMedicine, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Elsevier, 2020, 40 (4), pp.525-529. ⟨10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.002⟩, 2020, 40 (4), pp.525-529. ⟨10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.002⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; RESEARCH QUESTION:What is the real-world effectiveness of Fertistartkit® in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART)?DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study including anonymized data of women undergoing ovarian stimulation for ART with Fertistartkit between April 2016 and November 2017 and follow-up of clinical outcomes up to February 2018. Data were collected from the electronic patient databases of 12 French ART centres. The main outcome was number of oocytes retrieved. All data were categorized according to female age (39 years).RESULTS:A total of 1006 cycles from 914 women treated with Fertistartkit were included. At the time of first ovarian stimulation in the study, women were 34.9 ± 5.0 years old, with a median body mass index of 22.7 kg/m². Couples had been infertile for more than 4 years, with all patterns of causes of infertility. Ovarian stimulation was started with a median dose of 300 IU (interquartile range [IQR]: 150-300 IU) of Fertistartkit for 10 days (IQR: 9-11 days), so a median total dose of 2700 IU (IQR: 1800-3300 IU). The mean number of oocytes retrieved per cycle was 9.5 ± 6.8, and the mean number of mature oocytes per cycle was 7.4 ± 5.5. The obtained ongoing pregnancy per started cycle was 26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.1-27.9) and the obtained ongoing pregnancy per puncture was 27.0% (95% CI: 25.0-29.0).CONCLUSIONS:This is the first cohort to describe Fertistartkit treatment management in real-life conditions. The real-world data show that Fertistartkit is an effective option for ovarian stimulation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726491
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Reproductive BioMedicine, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Elsevier, 2020, 40 (4), pp.525-529. ⟨10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.002⟩, 2020, 40 (4), pp.525-529. ⟨10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.002⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0984b2a5c3f025c2a895ab22b4f62c65
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.002⟩