Back to Search Start Over

Reproducibility of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis is good, but influenced by the diagnostic style of pathologists

Authors :
Kamil Hakan Müftüoğlu
Sennur Ilvan
Osman Zekioglu
Zerrin Calay
George L. Mutter
H Dilek Bulbul
Aytekin Akyol
Elif Pestereli
Seyda Karaveli
Emine Cagnur Ulukus
Bahar Muezzinoglu
Sema Baykara
Tan A. Ince
Ozlem Ozen
Arzu Saglam
Funda Eren
Anil Dolgun
A Nihan Haberal
Meral Koyuncuoglu
Eylem Akar Özkan
Necmettin Özdemir
Derya Gümürdülü
Alp Usubutun
Ege Üniversitesi
Çukurova Üniversitesi
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Patoloji Anabilim Dalı.
Baykara, Sema
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

PubMed ID: 22301705<br />Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) applies specific diagnostic criteria to designate a monoclonal endometrial preinvasive glandular proliferation known from previous studies to confer a 45-fold increased risk for endometrial cancer. In this international study we estimate accuracy and precision of EIN diagnosis among 20 reviewing pathologists in different practice environments, and with differing levels of experience and training. Sixty-two endometrial biopsies diagnosed as benign, EIN, or adenocarcinoma by consensus of two expert subspecialty pathologists were used as a reference comparison to assess diagnostic accuracy of 20 reviewing pathologists. Interobserver reproducibility among the 20 reviewers provided a measure of diagnostic precision. Before evaluating cases, observers were self-trained by reviewing published textbook and/or online EIN diagnostic guidelines. Demographics of the reviewing pathologists, and their impressions regarding implementation of EIN terminology were recorded. Seventy-nine percent of the 20 reviewing pathologists' diagnoses were exactly concordant with the expert consensus (accuracy). The interobserver weighted ? values of 3-class EIN scheme (benign, EIN, carcinoma) diagnoses between expert consensus and each of reviewing pathologists averaged 0.72 (reproducibility, or precision). Reviewing pathologists demonstrated one of three diagnostic styles, which varied in the repertoire of diagnoses commonly used, and their nonrandom response to potentially confounding diagnostic features such as endometrial polyp, altered differentiation, background hormonal effects, and technically poor preparations. EIN diagnostic strategies can be learned and implemented from standard teaching materials with a high degree of reproducibility, but is impacted by the personal diagnostic style of each pathologist in responding to potential diagnostic confounders. © 2012 USCAP, Inc. All rights reserved.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....08338d6619c98e3c6e230a322034119f