Back to Search Start Over

Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work?

Authors :
David H. Cropley
Sarah Sinnett
James C. Kaufman
Roni Reiter-Palmon
John Baer
Kaufman, James C
Baer, John
Cropley, David H
Reiter-Palmon, Roni
Sinnett, Sarah
Source :
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 7:332-340
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
American Psychological Association (APA), 2013.

Abstract

What is the role of expertise in evaluating creative products? Novices and experts do not assess creativity similarly, indicating domain-specific knowledge's role in judging creativity. We describe two studies that examined how quasi-experts (people who have more experience in a domain than novices but also lack recognized standing as experts) compared to novices and experts in rating creative work. In Study One, we compared different types of quasi-experts with novices and experts in rating short stories. In Study Two, we compared experts, quasi-experts, and novices in evaluating an engineering product (a mousetrap design). Quasi-experts (regardless of type) seemed to be appropriate raters for short stories, yet results were mixed for the engineer quasi-experts. Some domains may require more expertise than others to properly evaluate creative work. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Details

ISSN :
1931390X and 19313896
Volume :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....08124eadf6f35ed8615d956adf0d429c