Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Outcomes in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older Receiving Non-Invasive Respiratory Support for Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure Consequent to COVID-19

Authors :
Andrea Vianello
Nello De Vita
Lorenza Scotti
Gabriella Guarnieri
Marco Confalonieri
Valeria Bonato
Beatrice Molena
Carlo Maestrone
Gianluca Airoldi
Carlo Olivieri
Pier Paolo Sainaghi
Federico Lionello
Giovanna Arcaro
Francesco Della Corte
Paolo Navalesi
Rosanna Vaschetto
Vianello, Andrea
De Vita, Nello
Scotti, Lorenza
Guarnieri, Gabriella
Confalonieri, Marco
Bonato, Valeria
Molena, Beatrice
Maestrone, Carlo
Airoldi, Gianluca
Olivieri, Carlo
Paolo Sainaghi, Pier
Lionello, Federico
Arcaro, Giovanna
Della Corte, Francesco
Navalesi, Paolo
Vaschetto, Rosanna
Source :
Journal of Clinical Medicine; Volume 11; Issue 5; Pages: 1372
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

As the clinical outcome of octogenarian patients hospitalised for COVID-19 is very poor, here we assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients aged 80 year or older hospitalised for COVID-19 receiving non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS). A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted in seven hospitals in Northern Italy. All patients aged ≥80 years with COVID-19 associated hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) undergoing NIRS between 24 February 2020, and 31 March 2021, were included. Out of 252 study participants, 156 (61.9%) and 163 (64.6%) died during hospital stay and within 90 days from hospital admission, respectively. In this case, 228 (90.5%) patients only received NIRS (NIRS group), while 24 (9.5%) were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) after NIRS failure (NIRS+IMV group). In-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between NIRS and NIRS+IMV group (61.0% vs. 70.8%, respectively; p = 0.507), while survival probability at 90 days was significantly higher for NIRS compared to NIRS+IMV patients (0.379 vs. 0.147; p = 0.0025). The outcome of octogenarian patients with COVID-19 receiving NIRS is quite poor. Caution should be used when considering transition from NIRS to IMV after NIRS failure.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Medicine; Volume 11; Issue 5; Pages: 1372
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....067b8b8526402b68457d8683409fdc87