Back to Search
Start Over
Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study
- Source :
- European Urology Focus, European Urology Focus, Elsevier, 2021, 7 (2), pp.347-351. ⟨10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.003⟩, Eur Urol Focus
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2021.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: The pathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer are time-consuming, error-prone, and subject to interobserver variability. Machine learning offers opportunities to improve the diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognostication of prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To develop a state-of-the-art deep learning algorithm for the histopathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate biopsy specimens. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 85 prostate core biopsy specimens from 25 patients were digitized at 20× magnification and annotated for Gleason 3, 4, and 5 prostate adenocarcinoma by a urologic pathologist. From these virtual slides, we sampled 14 803 image patches of 256 × 256 pixels, approximately balanced for malignancy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We trained and tested a deep residual convolutional neural network to classify each patch at two levels: (1) coarse (benign vs malignant) and (2) fine (benign vs Gleason 3 vs 4 vs 5). Model performance was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation. Randomization tests were used for hypothesis testing of the model performance versus chance. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The model demonstrated 91.5% accuracy (p < 0.001) at coarse-level classification of image patches as benign versus malignant (0.93 sensitivity, 0.90 specificity, and 0.95 average precision). The model demonstrated 85.4% accuracy (p < 0.001) at fine-level classification of image patches as benign versus Gleason 3 versus Gleason 4 versus Gleason 5 (0.83 sensitivity, 0.94 specificity, and 0.83 average precision), with the greatest number of confusions in distinguishing between Gleason 3 and 4, and between Gleason 4 and 5. Limitations include the small sample size and the need for external validation. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a deep learning-based computer vision algorithm demonstrated excellent performance for the histopathologic diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY: We developed a deep learning algorithm that demonstrated excellent performance for the diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer.
- Subjects :
- Male
Prostate biopsy
Biopsy
Urology
030232 urology & nephrology
Gleason grading
Magnification
Pilot Projects
Malignancy
Article
[INFO.INFO-AI]Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI]
03 medical and health sciences
Prostate cancer
Deep Learning
0302 clinical medicine
Prostate
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
medicine
Humans
Grading (tumors)
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Deep learning
Prostatic Neoplasms
medicine.disease
3. Good health
medicine.anatomical_structure
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Artificial intelligence
Neoplasm Grading
business
Algorithm
Algorithms
[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 24054569
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Urology Focus, European Urology Focus, Elsevier, 2021, 7 (2), pp.347-351. ⟨10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.003⟩, Eur Urol Focus
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....0511a199e21af510fa6fced4e80c543c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.003⟩