Back to Search Start Over

Durable Treatment of Refractory Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis via Robotic-assisted Reconstruction: A Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons Study

Authors :
William P. Parker
Joshua A. Broghammer
Lee C. Zhao
Jill C. Buckley
Nejd F. Alsikafi
Julia F. Buesser
Benjamin N. Breyer
Nabeel A. Shakir
Bradley A. Erickson
Gregory Amend
Source :
European Urology. 81:176-183
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Background Refractory vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy poses challenges distinct from bladder neck contracture, due to close proximity to the sphincter mechanism. Open reconstruction is technically demanding, risking de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or recurrence. Objective To demonstrate patency and continence outcomes of robotic-assisted VUAS repair. Design, setting and participants Patients with VUAS underwent robotic-assisted reconstruction from 2015 to 2020 in the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS) consortium of institutions. The minimum postoperative follow-up was 3 mo. Surgical procedure The space of Retzius is dissected and fibrotic tissue at the vesicourethral anastomosis is excised. Reconstruction is performed with either a primary anastomotic or an anterior bladder flap-based technique. Measurements Patency was defined as either the passage of a 17 French flexible cystoscope or a peak flow on uroflowmetry of >15 ml/s. De novo SUI was defined as either more than one pad per day or need for operative intervention. Results and limitations A total of 32 patients met the criteria, of whom 16 (50%) had a history of pelvic radiation. Intraoperatively, 15 (47%) patients had obliterative VUAS. The median length of hospital stay was 1 d. At a median follow-up of 12 mo, 24 (75%) patients had patent repairs and 26 (81%) were voiding per urethra. Of five men with 30-d complications, four were resolved conservatively (catheter obstruction and ileus). In eight patients, recurrent stenoses were managed with redo robotic reconstruction (in two), endoscopically (in four), or catheterization (in two). Of 13 patients without preexisting SUI, 11 (85%) remained continent at last follow-up. No patients underwent urinary diversion. Conclusions Robotic-assisted VUAS reconstruction is a viable and successful management option for refractory anastomotic stenosis following radical prostatectomy. The robotic transabdominal approach demonstrates high patency and continence rates. Patient Summary We studied the outcomes of robotic-assisted repair for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis. Most patients, after the procedure, were able to void per urethra and preserve existing continence.

Details

ISSN :
03022838
Volume :
81
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....04b402d6c1349f107a52a43bc2cc99e5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.013